PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

not going to work effectively. The Court of Appeals is not going to listen to those kinds of
arguments ...
Mr. Haeg: Oh they'll –--
Mr. Osterman: They'll throw you out
Mr. Haeg: ... they'll listen to this – they'll listen to this subject matter jurisdiction more so huh
that last was upheld in 1909
Mr. Osterman: I'm telling you the propriety of your case hangs on what
Cole did to you and perhaps on the fact that Robinson failed to – to back
it up. But at the same time I'm also telling you that when it comes to effective assistance of
counsel as determined by that little short 2 page article with footnotes for the third page. Ok If
you read that, if you comprehend what effective and ineffective assistance are and measure it by
the Strickland test I can't get to Chuck. Can't do anything with Chuck. Maybe something could
be done ethically with Chuck. Ok Through the attorney grievance commission for his conduct
for not seeking to back it up. I don't know. I don't know that his – that his decision – I
couldn't find anything in any of my research anywhere that said that his
failure to shove that plea agreement down their throats was ineffective
assistance. Ok I couldn't find anything. And I couldn't find any indication or any
other indicia that lead me to conclude that. Cause I made that statement to you – I just don't
feel like I – that's it's my responsibility to run around and destroy
people's livelihoods. And I don't give a damn if they're fishermen, or bankers, or whoever
202