PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

OSTERMAN: Sure.
HAEG: And now it looks like it’s one of the…
OSTERMAN: at the end.
HAEG: Yep. Why is that
OSTERMAN: You never put your focus issue at the beginning.
HAEG: What you are saying is don’t focus on what you really want
to focus on
OSTERMAN: To some degree yes.
HAEG: Hmm. Ok.
OSTERMAN: You have stronger merits in your case then rubbing Cole and -uh- -uh-
Robinson's nose in this case.
HAEG: Ok and what are the stronger merits
OSTERMAN: What are the issues here Do you disagree with the issues that we’ve
outlined
HAEG: Well I’ve sent – at least Jackie says she’s sent you everything that I had
problems with.
OSTERMAN: Yeah we had everything that you’ve had problems with.
HAEG: So you have everything that I have problems with
OSTERMAN: Right. So do you disagree with the things that we’ve put in these issues
HAEG: Well like your – this first argument. Trial court erred in failing to dismiss the
first amended information in this case cause the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to
proceed with the case where the original information was unsupported by oath or affirmation
before a judge or magistrate. Do you – do you think that has…
OSTERMAN: I think that has some merit.
HAEG: Ok. How much merit
OSTERMAN: Enough I want the Court of Appeals to see it. There are a lot of things in
here I don’t want the Court of Appeals to necessarily look at. The statement of facts against you
is a very negative statement of facts.
158