PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

HAEG: Ok.
OSTERMAN: He’s obligated to the standards of an attorney under the circumstances.
Under the circumstances how many attorneys would jump up and point the finger at Cole and
say “ineffective assistance”
HAEG: Every attorney.
OSTERMAN: See he can’t do anything. If he stands… Look Cole…
HAEG: Anytime he realized it he should have said it. And what got… What’s goanna
come back and eat Chuck’s lunch is when he said he had no obligation to utilize any of that. And
I believe both of you were there when he said that with two tape recorders running.
OSTERMAN: See I don’t think he has an obligation.
HAEG: He has every obligation to tell me the defenses I have. And he deliberately
mislead me and didn’t tell me and then when I brought it up he says “oh well I don’t have to tell
you that” and “an attorney has no obligation to tell the client the truth about the law”. He actually
told me that.
OSTERMAN: I think that’s a little too far fetched.
HAEG: Well I’m thinking that’s real far fetched. And then when he -uh- anyway you
know and then when I [subpoena] Brent Cole to be there to testify that I had done all this stuff
for this rule 11 agreement…
OSTERMAN: Mm hmm. He doesn’t show.
HAEG: And Chuck Robinson tells him he doesn’t have to show.
OSTERMAN: Mm hmm.
HAEG: Is that my right or is that your right
OSTERMAN: Bear with me – it’s not an issue in this appeal.
_____________________________________________________
OSTERMAN: He didn’t tell you that whatever you said would be admissible
HAEG: Well and truth be told they couldn’t have been used against me according to
Evidence Rule 410.
OSTERMAN: Yeah. But they were.
175