PCR Exhibits - Alaska State of Corruption

OSTERMAN: No.
HAEG: Why not
OSTERMAN: Cause all you’re – you’re not after the ineffective
assistance of counsel claim then. You’re after the public humiliation and
embarrassment seg - segment of it and it won’t work.
HAEG: Ok. So in other words…
OSTERMAN: The issues…
HAEG: … your attorney lying to you is effective assistance of counsel – is that what
you’re saying
OSTERMAN: No. I’m not saying that. I’m saying it’s not an effective argument to the
Court of Appeals.
HAEG: If I was on the Court of Appeals and this poor bastard comes strolling in and
says, man I can prove that my attorney was lying to me to the tune of 50 or 60 thousand dollars
or my attorneys – I would say whew boy you didn’t get your moneys worth there buddy. I don’t
think that you might even gotten effective assistance of counsel buddy.
OSTERMAN: Guess what
HAEG: What
OSTERMAN: I’ve written a lot of things for the Court of Appeals and the Supreme
Court and you’re wrong.
HAEG: So have you wrote to them about attorneys lying to their clients
OSTERMAN: I have as a matter of fact.
HAEG: And what’d they have to say about it
OSTERMAN: 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals says they don’t care whether you – whether
your attorneys you believe lied to you – you have proof to do it. Did he appear in court and do
his job properly for further mandates his oath of off[ice] or his oath of duty What do you say
now
HAEG: Well I would say when he’s lying to you about your rights as guaranteed by law
and screwed you out of them I’d be pissed.
OSTERMAN: That’s what we talked about in that particular area.
160