20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.8 Supersymmetry 33<br />

treated perturbatively. Ultimately the resolution of such delicate and complex issues<br />

would presumably require the development of the perturbative expansion not around<br />

flat space, but more appropriately around the de Sitter metric, for which R = 2λ 0 /κ 2 .<br />

Even then one would have to confront such genuinely non-perturbative issues, such<br />

as what happens to the spin-zero ghost mass, whether the ghost poles gets shifted<br />

away from the real axis by quantum effects, and what the true ground state of the<br />

theory looks like in the long distance, strong fluctuation regime not accessible by<br />

perturbation theory.<br />

What is also a bit surprising is that higher derivative gravity, to one-loop order,<br />

does not exhibit a nontrivial ultraviolet point in G, even though such a fixed point<br />

is clearly present in the 2 + ε expansion (to be discussed later) at the one- and twoloop<br />

order, as well as in the lattice regularized theory in four dimensions (also to be<br />

discussed later). But this could just reflect a limitation of the one-loop calculation;<br />

to properly estimate the uncertainties of the perturbative results in higher derivative<br />

gravity and their potential physical implications a two-loop calculation is needed,<br />

which hopefully will be performed in the near future.<br />

To summarize, higher derivative gravity theories based on R 2 -type terms are perturbatively<br />

renormalizable, but exhibit some short-distance oddities in the tree-level<br />

spectrum, associated with either ghosts or tachyons. Their perturbative (weak field)<br />

treatment suggest that the higher derivative couplings are only relevant at short distances,<br />

comparable to the Planck length, but the general evolution of the couplings<br />

away from a regime where perturbation theory is reliable remains an open question,<br />

which perhaps will never be answered satisfactorily in perturbation theory, if non-<br />

Abelian gauge theories, which are also asymptotically free, are taken as a guide.<br />

1.8 Supersymmetry<br />

An alternative approach to the vexing problem of ultraviolet divergences in perturbative<br />

quantum gravity (and for that matter, in any field theory) is to build in<br />

some additional degree of symmetry between bosons and fermions, such that loop<br />

effects acquire reduced divergence properties, or even become finite. One such proposal,<br />

based on the invariance under local supersymmetry transformation, adds to<br />

the Einstein gravity Lagrangian a spin-3/2 gravitino field, whose purpose is to exactly<br />

cancel the loop divergences in the ordinary gravitational contribution. This last<br />

result comes from the well known fact that fermion loops in quantum field theory<br />

carry an additional factor of minus one, thus potentially reducing, or even canceling<br />

out entirely, a whole class of divergent diagrams. The issue then is to specify the<br />

nature of such a supersymmetry transformation, and from it deduce an extension of<br />

pure gravity which includes such a symmetry in an exact way. Since ordinary gravity<br />

has a local gauge invariance under the diffeomorphism group, one would expect<br />

its supersymmetric extension to have some sort of local supersymmetry.<br />

The first step towards defining a theory of supergravity is therefore to introduce<br />

the concept of global supersymmetry. Quantum field theory in flat space is invariant

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!