20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.3 Lattice Diffeomorphism Invariance 239<br />

l 2 i = l 2 0i + q i + δl 2 i , (7.49)<br />

where q i describes an arbitrary but small deviation from a regular lattice, and δl 2 i is<br />

a gauge fluctuation, whose form needs to be determined. We shall keep terms O(q 2 )<br />

and O(q δl 2 ), but neglect terms O(δl 4 ).<br />

The squared volumes V 2 n (σ) of n-dimensional simplices σ are given by homogeneous<br />

polynomials of order (l 2 ) n . In particular for the area of a triangle A Δ with<br />

arbitrary edges l 1 ,l 2 ,l 3 one has<br />

δA 2 Δ = 1 8 (−l2 1 + l 2 2 + l 2 3)δl 2 1 + 1 8 (l2 1 − l 2 2 + l 2 3)δl 2 2 + 1 8 (l2 1 + l 2 2 − l 2 3)δl 2 3 , (7.50)<br />

and similarly for the other quantities which are needed in order to construct the<br />

action. For our notation in two dimensions we refer to Fig. (7.5). The subsequent<br />

Figs. 7.6 and 7.7 illustrate the difference between a gauge deformation of the surface,<br />

which leaves the area and curvature at the point labeled by 0 invariant, and a<br />

physical deformation which corresponds to a re-assignment of edge lengths meeting<br />

at the vertex 0 such that it alters the area and curvature at 0. In the following we will<br />

characterize unambiguously what we mean by the two different operations.<br />

Consider therefore an expansion about a deformed equilateral lattice, for which<br />

l 0i = 1 to start with. A motivation for this choice is provided by the fact that in<br />

the numerical studies of two-dimensional gravity the averages of the squared edge<br />

lengths in the three principal directions turn out to be equal, 〈l1 2〉 = 〈l2 2 〉 = 〈l2 3 〉.The<br />

baricentric area associated with vertex 0 is then given by<br />

A = A 0 (q)+ 1 [<br />

2 · 3 5/2 δl01 2 (3 + q 06 − 4q 01 + q 02 + q 16 + q 12 )<br />

+ δl02 2 (3 + q 01 − 4q 02 + q 03 + q 12 + q 23 )<br />

+ δl03 2 (3 + q 02 − 4q 03 + q 04 + q 23 + q 34 )<br />

+ δl04 2 (3 + q 03 − 4q 04 + q 05 + q 34 + q 45 )<br />

+ δl05 2 (3 + q 04 − 4q 05 + q 06 + q 45 + q 56 )<br />

]<br />

+ δl06 2 (3 + q 05 − 4q 06 + q 01 + q 56 + q 16 )<br />

+ O(δl 4 ) .<br />

(7.51)<br />

The normalization here is such that A 0 =<br />

in more compact notation, at the vertex 0<br />

√<br />

3<br />

2 for q i = 0. Equivalently one can write,<br />

A = A 0 (q)+ 1 3 v A(q) · δl 2 + O(δl 4 ) , (7.52)<br />

with δl 2 =(δl01 2 ,...,δl2 06<br />

). After adding the contributions from the neighboring<br />

vertices one obtains<br />

∑ A = ∑ A 0 (q)+v A (q) · δl 2 + O(δl 4 ) . (7.53)<br />

P 0 ...P 6 P 0 ...P 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!