20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

188 6 Lattice Regularized Quantum Gravity<br />

“plaquette variables” associated with an elementary square (thereby involving the<br />

ordered product of four group elements), provided the Bianchi identity constraint is<br />

included as well in the lattice path integral.<br />

6.8 Gravitational Wilson Loop<br />

We have seen that with each neighboring pair of simplices s,s + 1 one can associate<br />

a Lorentz transformation R μ ν(s,s + 1), which describes how a given vector<br />

V μ transforms between the local coordinate systems in these two simplices, and<br />

that the above transformation is directly related to the continuum path-ordered (P)<br />

exponential of the integral of the local affine connection Γ λ<br />

μν(x) via<br />

R μ ν =<br />

∫<br />

[<br />

Pe<br />

path<br />

between simplices<br />

Γ λ dx λ ] μ<br />

ν , (6.60)<br />

with the connection having support only on the common interface between the two<br />

simplices. Also, for a closed elementary path C h encircling a hinge h and passing<br />

through each of the simplices that meet at that hinge one has for the total rotation<br />

matrix R ≡ ∏ s R s,s+1 associated with the given hinge<br />

[<br />

∏<br />

s<br />

R s,s+1<br />

] μ<br />

ν = [<br />

e δ(h)U(h)] μν . (6.61)<br />

Equivalently, this last expression can be re-written in terms of a surface integral<br />

of the Riemann tensor, projected along the surface area element bivector A αβ (C h )<br />

associated with the loop,<br />

∫<br />

[ ] 1<br />

μ<br />

∏ R s,s+1<br />

[e ≈ 2<br />

R··αβ Aαβ (C h )] μ<br />

S . (6.62)<br />

s<br />

ν ν<br />

More generally one might want to consider a near-planar, but non-infinitesimal,<br />

closed loop C, as shown in Fig. 7.9. Along this closed loop the overall rotation<br />

matrix will still be given by<br />

R μ ν(C) =<br />

[ ] μ<br />

∏ R s,s+1 . (6.63)<br />

s⊂C<br />

ν<br />

In analogy with the infinitesimal loop case, one would like to state that for the overall<br />

rotation matrix one has<br />

R μ ν(C) ≈<br />

[e δ(C)U(C))] μ<br />

, (6.64)<br />

ν

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!