20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10 1 Continuum <strong>Formulation</strong><br />

1<br />

2 m2 [ h μν h μν − (h μ μ) 2 ] , (1.58)<br />

is added to the gravitational Lagrangian. As in electromagnetism, such a term violates<br />

the local gauge invariance of Eq. (1.11), and in the general theory it spoils<br />

general coordinate invariance and the principle of equivalence. Since a massive<br />

spin-two particle has five polarization states and a massless one two, one has a<br />

clear mismatch in the number of physical degrees of freedom, even as m → 0, as<br />

discussed originally in (van Dam and Veltman, 1970; Zakharov, 1970). In particular<br />

these authors point out the fact that the discontinuity which appears in the classical<br />

theory when the graviton mass goes to zero implies that the bending of light by the<br />

sun for massive gravitons is only 3/4 of the experimentally confirmed general relativistic<br />

effect, thereby ruling out the possibility of a massive graviton, no matter how<br />

small its mass is. Furthermore the discontinuity does not seem to go away when a<br />

cosmological constant term is included (Dilkes et al, 2001). The latter acts in some<br />

way as a mass-like term, but does not increase the number of polarization states<br />

of the graviton since it does not break general covariance, so that a persistence of<br />

the discontinuity would be expected, for fixed cosmological constant. The problem<br />

is not entirely new, as it arises in gauge theories as well, where one finds that the<br />

only way to give the gauge particle a mass without spoiling local gauge invariance<br />

is via the Higgs mechanism. This result would suggest that a smooth limit might be<br />

obtained if a graviton mass is generated spontaneously by some sort of dynamical<br />

mechanism.<br />

In the general theory, the energy-momentum tensor for matter T μν is most suitably<br />

defined in terms of the variation of the matter action I matter ,<br />

∫<br />

δI matter = 1 2<br />

dx √ g δg μν T μν , (1.59)<br />

and is conserved if the matter action is a scalar,<br />

∇ μ T μν = 0 . (1.60)<br />

Variation of the gravitational Einstein-Hilbert action of Eq. (1.35), with the matter<br />

part added, then leads to the field equations<br />

R μν − 1 2 g μνR + λg μν = 8πGT μν . (1.61)<br />

Here we have also added a cosmological constant term, with a scaled cosmological<br />

constant λ = λ 0 /16πG, which follows from adding to the gravitational action a term<br />

λ 0<br />

∫ √ g.<br />

1<br />

1 The present experimental value for Newton’s constant is ¯hG/c 3 =(1.61624(12) × 10 −33 cm) 2 .<br />

Recent observational evidence [reviewed in (Damour, 2006)] suggests a non-vanishing positive<br />

cosmological constant λ, corresponding to a vacuum density ρ vac ≈ (2.3 × 10 −3 eV ) 4 with ρ vac related<br />

to λ by λ = 8πGρ vac /c 4 . As can be seen from the field equations, λ has the same dimensions<br />

as a curvature. One has from observation λ ∼ 1/(10 28 cm) 2 , so this new curvature length scale is<br />

comparable to the size of the visible universe ∼ 4.4 × 10 28 cm.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!