20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

196 6 Lattice Regularized Quantum Gravity<br />

assigned between vertices which appear on some lattice in the ensemble, although<br />

this is not strictly necessary, as distances can also be defined for locations that do<br />

not coincide with any specific vertex.<br />

The gravitational measure then contains an integration over the elementary lattice<br />

degrees of freedom, the lattice edge lengths. For the edges one writes the lattice<br />

integration measure as<br />

∫<br />

dμ[l] =<br />

N<br />

∏<br />

n=1<br />

∫ ∞<br />

0<br />

dl 2 n l σ n , (6.96)<br />

where σ is a parameter interpolating between different local measures. The positivity<br />

of the edge lengths is all that remains of the triangle inequality constraints in<br />

one dimension. The factor ln σ plays a role analogous to the g σ/2 which appears for<br />

continuum measures in the Euclidean functional integral.<br />

The functional measure does not have compact support, and the cosmological<br />

term (with a coefficient λ 0 > 0) is therefore necessary to obtain convergence of the<br />

functional integral, as can be seen for example from the expression for the average<br />

edge length,<br />

〈L(l)〉 = 〈<br />

with<br />

N<br />

∑<br />

n=1<br />

Z N (λ 0 )=<br />

l n 〉 = Z −1<br />

N<br />

N ∫ ∞<br />

∏<br />

n=1 0<br />

N<br />

∏<br />

n=1<br />

∫ ∞<br />

0<br />

dl 2 n l σ n exp<br />

(<br />

dl 2 n l σ n exp<br />

(<br />

)<br />

N N∑<br />

−λ 0 ∑ l n l n = 2 + σ<br />

n=1 n=1<br />

λ 0<br />

N<br />

(6.97)<br />

) [ ] N<br />

N<br />

2 Γ (2 + σ)<br />

−λ 0 ∑ l n =<br />

n=1<br />

λ0<br />

2+σ . (6.98)<br />

Similarly one finds for the fluctuation in the total length ΔL/L = 1/ √ (2 + σ)N,<br />

which requires σ > −2. Different choices for λ 0 then correspond to trivial rescalings<br />

of the average lattice spacing, l 0 ≡〈l〉 =(2 + σ)/λ 0 .<br />

In the continuum, the action of Eq. (6.95) is invariant under continuous reparametrizations<br />

x → x ′ (x)=x − ε(x) (6.99)<br />

( ) dx 2<br />

g(x) → g ′ (x ′ )=<br />

dx ′ g(x)=g(x)+2 g(x)<br />

or equivalently<br />

( dε<br />

dx<br />

)<br />

+ O(ε 2 ) , (6.100)<br />

δg(x) ≡ g ′ (x ′ ) − g(x)=2g∂ε , (6.101)<br />

and we have set ∂ ≡ d/dx. A gauge can then be chosen by imposing g ′ (x ′ )=1,<br />

which can be achieved by the choice of coordinates x ′ = ∫ dx √ g(x).<br />

The discrete analog of the transformation rule is<br />

δl n = ε n+1 − ε n , (6.102)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!