20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

274 8 Numerical Studies<br />

are not affected by uncontrollable errors, such as for example the 2 + ε expansion<br />

of Sect. 3.5. Since the lattice cutoff and the method of dimensional regularization<br />

cut the theory off in the ultraviolet in rather different ways, one needs to compare<br />

universal quantities which are cutoff-independent. One example is the critical exponent<br />

ν, as well as any other non-trivial scaling dimension that might arise. Within<br />

the 2 + ε expansion only one such exponent appears, to all orders in the loop expansion,<br />

as ν −1 = −β ′ (G c ). Therefore one central issue in the lattice regularized<br />

theory is the value of the universal exponent ν.<br />

Knowledge of ν would allow one to be more specific about the running of the<br />

gravitational coupling. One purpose of the discussion in Sect. 3.3 was to convince<br />

the reader that the exponent ν determines the renormalization group running of<br />

G(μ 2 ) in the vicinity of the fixed point, as in Eq. (3.22) for the non-linear σ-model,<br />

and more appropriately in Eq. (3.117) for quantized gravity. From a practical point<br />

of view, on the lattice it is difficult to determine the running of G(μ 2 ) directly from<br />

correlation functions , since the effects from the running of G are generally small.<br />

Instead one would like to make use of the analog of Eqs. (3.29), (3.59) and (3.60)<br />

for the non-linear σ-model, and, again, more appropriately of Eqs. (3.121) and possibly<br />

(3.127) for gravity to determine ν, and from there the running of G. Butthe<br />

correlation length ξ = m −1 is also difficult to compute, since it enters the curvature<br />

correlations at fixed geodesic distance, which are hard to compute for (genuinely<br />

geometric) reasons to be discussed later. Furthermore, these generally decay exponentially<br />

in the distance at strong G, and can therefore be difficult to compute due<br />

to the signal to noise problem of numerical simulations.<br />

Fortunately the exponent ν can be determined instead, and with good accuracy,<br />

from singularities of the derivatives of the path integral Z, whose singular part is<br />

expected, on the basis of very general arguments, to behave in the vicinity of the<br />

fixed point as F ≡− 1 V lnZ ∼ ξ −d where ξ is the gravitational correlation length.<br />

From Eq. (3.121) relating ξ (G) to G − G c and ν one can then determine ν, aswell<br />

as the critical coupling G c .<br />

8.2 Observables, Phase Structure and Critical Exponents<br />

The starting point is once again the lattice regularized path integral with action as<br />

in Eq. (6.43) and measure as in Eq. (6.76). Then the lattice action for pure fourdimensional<br />

Euclidean gravity contains a cosmological constant and Regge scalar<br />

curvature term as in Eq. (6.90)<br />

I latt = λ 0 ∑<br />

h<br />

V h (l 2 ) − k∑δ h (l 2 )A h (l 2 ) , (8.1)<br />

h<br />

with k = 1/(8πG), and leads to the regularized lattice functional integral<br />

∫<br />

Z latt = [dl 2 ] e −λ 0 ∑ h V h +k ∑ h δ h A h<br />

, (8.2)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!