20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.10 Minisuperspace 119<br />

is the inverse of the deWitt supermetric G ij,kl .<br />

Due to ambiguities in the choice of operator ordering in the Wheeler-DeWitt<br />

equations, not all terms and their coefficients can be fixed in a unique way. General<br />

symmetry requirements (here covariance in superspace) restrict the Hamiltonian<br />

H = ∫ d 3 xN(x)H(x) in Eqs. (4.62) and (4.72) to be of the following form (Hawking<br />

and Page, 1986 a,b)<br />

∫<br />

H = − 1 2 ∇2 + β · 16πG<br />

∫<br />

V =<br />

d 3 xNg −1/2 g ij<br />

δ<br />

δg ij<br />

+ ε + V (4.92)<br />

d 3 xN √ g [ 1<br />

16πG (−3 R + 2λ)+U(φ) ] (4.93)<br />

where ∇ 2 the covariant Laplacian in the function space W with metric Γ (N) [see<br />

Eq. (4.90)],<br />

∫<br />

ε = ξ R(g)+η d 3 x √ g , (4.94)<br />

is a scalar term involving the scalar curvature on the function space W, ξ and η two<br />

constants, and<br />

U = T 00 − 1 2 π2 φ . (4.95)<br />

Since in general the β-term violates the self-adjointness requirement on H, one<br />

sets β = 0. The most natural (and simplest choice) for ξ , the coefficient of the<br />

scalar curvature term R, is zero. The η term can be re-absorbed into a shift of the<br />

cosmological term λ. We shall not dwell here on the rather technical point that in<br />

general the function N enters non-linearly in the superspace connection on W, and<br />

therefore in H, which then spoils the interpretation of N as a Lagrange multiplier.<br />

In general the wavefunction for all the dynamical variables of the gravitational<br />

field in the universe is difficult to calculate, since an infinite number of degrees<br />

of freedom are involved: the infinitely many values of the metric at all spacetime<br />

points, and the infinitely many values of the matter field φ at the same points. One<br />

option is to restrict the choice of variable to a finite number of suitable degrees of<br />

freedom (Blyth and Isham, 1975; Hartle and Hawking, 1983). As a result the overall<br />

quantum fluctuations are severely restricted, since these are now only allowed to be<br />

nonzero along the surviving dynamical directions. If the truncation is severe enough,<br />

the transverse-traceless nature of the graviton fluctuation is lost as well. Also, since<br />

one is not expanding the quantum solution in a small parameter, it can be difficult<br />

to estimate corrections. In a cosmological context, it seems natural to consider initially<br />

a homogeneous and isotropic model, and restrict the function space to two<br />

variables, the scale factor a(t) and a minimally coupled homogeneous scalar field<br />

φ(t) (Hawking and Page, 1986a,b). The space-time metric is given by<br />

dτ 2 = N 2 (t)dt 2 − g ij dx i dx j . (4.96)<br />

The three-metric g ij is then determined entirely by the scale factor a(t),<br />

g ij = a 2 (t) ˜g ij , (4.97)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!