20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.16 Lattice Gravitino 215<br />

and involves both the standard affine connection Γ σ<br />

νρ, as well as the vierbein connection<br />

ω ν ab = 1 2 [e μ<br />

a (∂ ν e bμ − ∂ μ e bν )+e ρ<br />

a e σ<br />

b (∂ σ e cρ )e c ν] ,<br />

− (a ↔ b) (6.181)<br />

with Dirac spin matrices σ ab = 1 2i [γ a,γ b ], and ε μνρσ the usual Levi-Civita tensor,<br />

such that ε μνρσ = −gε μνρσ .<br />

Next one considers just two neighboring simplices s 1 and s 2 , covered by a common<br />

coordinate system x μ . When the two vierbeins in s 1 and s 2 are made to coincide,<br />

one can then use a common set of gamma matrices γ μ within both simplices. Then<br />

(in the absence of torsion) the covariant derivative D μ in Eq. (6.179) reduces to just<br />

an ordinary derivative. The fermion field ψ μ (x) within the two simplices can then be<br />

suitably interpolated, and one obtains a lattice action expression very similar to the<br />

spinor case. One can then relax the condition that the vierbeins e μ a (s 1 ) and e μ a (s 2 )<br />

in the two simplices coincide. If they do not, then they will be related by a matrix<br />

R(s 2 ,s 1 ) such that<br />

e μ a (s 2 )=R μ ν(s 2 ,s 1 ) e ν a (s 1 ) , (6.182)<br />

and whose spinorial representation S was given previously in Eq. (6.24). But the<br />

new ingredient in the spin-3/2 case is that, besides requiring a spin rotation matrix<br />

S(s 2 ,s 1 ), now one also needs the matrix R ν μ(s,s ′ ) describing the corresponding<br />

parallel transport of the Lorentz vector ψ μ (s) from a simplex s 1 to the neighboring<br />

simplex s 2 .<br />

An invariant lattice action for a massless spin-3/2 particle takes therefore the<br />

form<br />

I = − 1 2<br />

with<br />

∑<br />

faces f(ss ′ )<br />

V [ f (s,s ′ )]ε μνλσ ¯ψ μ (s)S[R(s,s ′ )]γ ν (s ′ )n λ (s,s ′ )R ρ σ (s,s ′ )ψ ρ (s ′ )<br />

(6.183)<br />

¯ψ μ (s)S[R(s,s ′ )]γ ν (s ′ )ψ ρ (s ′ ) ≡ ¯ψ μα (s)S α β [R(s,s′ )]γ β<br />

ν γ(s ′ )ψ γ ρ(s ′ ) , (6.184)<br />

and the sum ∑ faces f(ss ′ ) extends over all interfaces f (s,s ′ ) connecting one simplex<br />

s to a neighboring simplex s ′ . When compared to the spin-1/2 case, the most important<br />

modification is the second rotation matrix R ν μ(s,s ′ ), which describes the<br />

parallel transport of the fermionic vector ψ μ from the site s to the site s ′ , which is<br />

required in order to obtain locally a Lorentz scalar contribution to the action.<br />

In supergravity one more term is needed in the action. In order to achieve local<br />

supersymmetry invariance, one needs an additional quartic fermion self-interaction<br />

term, given in Eq. (1.176), and which is of the form (Ferrara, Freedman and van<br />

Nieuwenhuizen, 1976)<br />

1<br />

L 4 = −<br />

32κ 2 √ g (εταβν ετ<br />

γδμ + ε ταμν ετ<br />

γδβ − ε τβμν ετ γδα )<br />

×( ¯ψ α γ μ ψ β )( ¯ψ γ γ ν ψ δ ) , (6.185)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!