20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

198 6 Lattice Regularized Quantum Gravity<br />

6.11 Lattice Higher Derivative Terms<br />

So far only the gravitational Einstein-Hilbert contribution to the lattice action and<br />

the cosmological constant term have been considered. There are several motivations<br />

for extending the discussion to lattice higher derivative terms, which would include<br />

the fact that these terms a) might appear in the original microscopic action, or might<br />

have to be included to cure the classical unboundedness problem of the Euclidean<br />

Einstein-Hilbert action, b) that they are in any case generated by radiative corrections,<br />

and c) that on a more formal level they may shed new light on the relationship<br />

between the lattice and continuum expressions for curvature terms as well as quantities<br />

such as the Riemann tensor on a hinge, Eq. (6.36).<br />

For these reasons we will discuss here a generalization of the Regge gravity<br />

equivalent of the Einstein action to curvature squared terms. When considering<br />

contributions quadratic in the curvature there are overall six possibilities, listed in<br />

Eq. (1.127). Among the two topological invariants, the Euler characteristic χ for<br />

a simplicial decomposition may be obtained from a particular case of the general<br />

formula for the analogue of the Lipschitz-Killing curvatures of smooth Riemannian<br />

manifolds for piecewise flat spaces. The formula of (Cheeger, Müller and Schrader,<br />

1984) reduces in four dimensions to<br />

[<br />

χ = ∑ 1 − ∑<br />

σ 0<br />

]<br />

(0,2) − ∑ (0,4)+ ∑ (0,2)(2,4) , (6.106)<br />

σ 2 ⊃σ 0 σ 4 ⊃σ 0 σ 4 ⊃σ 2 ⊃σ 0<br />

where σ i denotes an i-dimensional simplex and (i, j) denotes the (internal) dihedral<br />

angle at an i-dimensional face of a j-dimensional simplex. Thus, for example, (0,2)<br />

is the angle at the vertex of a triangle and (2,4) is the dihedral angle at a triangle<br />

in a 4-simplex (The normalization of the angles is such that the volume of a sphere<br />

in any dimension is one; thus planar angles are divided by 2π, 3-dimensional solid<br />

angles by 4π and so on).<br />

Of course, as noted before, there is a much simpler formula for the Euler characteristic<br />

of a simplicial complex<br />

χ =<br />

d<br />

∑<br />

i=0<br />

(−1) i N i , (6.107)<br />

where N i is the number of simplices of dimension i. However, it may turn out to be<br />

useful in quantum gravity calculations to have a formula for χ in terms of the angles,<br />

and hence of the edge lengths, of the simplicial decomposition. These expression<br />

are interesting and useful, but do not shed much light on how the other curvature<br />

squared terms should be constructed.<br />

In a piecewise linear space curvature is detected by going around elementary<br />

loops which are dual to a (d − 2)-dimensional subspace. The area of the loop itself<br />

is not well defined, since any loop inside the d-dimensional simplices bordering the<br />

hinge will give the same result for the deficit angle. On the other hand the hinge has<br />

a content (the length of the edge in d = 3 and the area of the triangle in d = 4), and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!