20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.9 Lattice Regularized <strong>Path</strong> <strong>Integral</strong> 191<br />

dimensions is<br />

δg ij (l 2 )= 1 2 (δl2 0i + δl 2 0 j − δl 2 ij) . (6.68)<br />

For one d-dimensional simplex labeled by s the integration over the metric is thus<br />

equivalent to an integration over the edge lengths, and one has the identity<br />

( ) 1 σ∏<br />

detg ij (s) dg ij (s)=<br />

d!√<br />

( − 1 ) d(d−1)<br />

2<br />

2<br />

i≥ j<br />

[<br />

Vd (l 2 ) ] σ d(d+1)/2<br />

dlk 2 . (6.69)<br />

∏<br />

k=1<br />

There are d(d + 1)/2 edges for each simplex, just as there are d(d + 1)/2 independent<br />

components for the metric tensor in d dimensions (Cheeger, Müller and<br />

Schrader, 1982). Here one is ignoring temporarily the triangle inequality constraints,<br />

which will further require all sub-determinants of g ij to be positive, including the<br />

obvious restriction l 2 k > 0.<br />

Let us discuss here briefly the simplicial inequalities which need to be imposed<br />

on the edge lengths (Wheeler, 1964). These are conditions on the edge lengths l ij<br />

such that the sites i can be considered the vertices of a d-simplex embedded in flat<br />

d-dimensional Euclidean space. In one dimension, d = 1, one requires trivially for<br />

all edge lengths<br />

l 2 ij > 0 . (6.70)<br />

In two dimensions, d = 2, the conditions on the edge lengths are again lij 2 > 0asin<br />

one dimensions, as well as<br />

( ) 1 2<br />

A 2 Δ = detg (2)<br />

ij<br />

(s) > 0 , (6.71)<br />

2!<br />

which is equivalent, by virtue of Heron’s formula for the area of a triangle A 2 Δ =<br />

s(s − l ij )(s − l jk )(s − l ki ) where s is the semi-perimeter s = 1 2 (l ij+ l jk + l ki ),tothe<br />

requirement that the area of the triangle be positive. In turn Eq. (6.71) implies that<br />

the triangle inequalities must be satisfied for all three edges,<br />

l ij + l jk > l ik<br />

l jk + l ki > l ji<br />

l ki + l ij > l kj . (6.72)<br />

In three dimensions, d = 3, the conditions on the edge lengths are again such that<br />

one recovers a physical tetrahedron. One therefore requires for the individual edge<br />

lengths the condition of Eq. (6.70), the reality and positivity of all four triangle areas<br />

as in Eq. (6.71), as well as the requirement that the volume of the tetrahedron be real<br />

and positive,<br />

( ) 1 2<br />

Vtetrahedron 2 = detg (3)<br />

ij<br />

(s) > 0 . (6.73)<br />

3!<br />

The generalization to higher dimensions is such that one requires all triangle inequalities<br />

and their higher dimensional analogs to be satisfied,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!