20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.6 Phases of Gravity in 2+ε Dimensions 95<br />

μ d<br />

dμ m ≡ μ d [<br />

] A m μ |G(μ) − G c | ν = 0 , (3.122)<br />

dμ<br />

provided G runs in accordance with Eq. (3.117). To one-loop order one has from<br />

Eqs. (3.106) and (3.120) ν = 1/(d −2). When the bare (lattice) coupling G(Λ)=G c<br />

one has achieved criticality, m = 0. How far the bare theory is from the critical point<br />

is determined by the choice of G(Λ), the distance from criticality being measured<br />

by the deviation ΔG = G(Λ) − G c .<br />

Furthermore Eq. (3.121) shows how the (lattice) continuum limit is to be taken.<br />

In order to reach the continuum limit a ≡ 1/Λ → 0 for fixed physical correlation<br />

ξ = 1/m, the bare coupling G(Λ) needs to be tuned so as to approach the ultraviolet<br />

fixed point at G c ,<br />

Λ → ∞ , m fixed , G → G c . (3.123)<br />

The fixed point at G c thus plays a central role in the cutoff theory: together with the<br />

universal scaling exponent ν it determines the correct unique quantum continuum<br />

limit in the presence of an ultraviolet cutoff Λ. Sometimes it can be convenient to<br />

measure all quantities in units of the cutoff and set Λ = 1/a = 1. In this case the<br />

quantity m measured in units of the cutoff (i.e. m/Λ) has to be tuned to zero in order<br />

to construct the lattice continuum limit: for a fixed lattice cutoff, the continuum<br />

limit is approached by tuning the bare lattice G(Λ) to G c . In other words, the lattice<br />

continuum limit has to be taken in the vicinity of the non-trivial ultraviolet point.<br />

The discussion given above is not altered significantly, at least in its qualitative<br />

aspects, by the inclusion of the two-loop correction of Eq. (3.110). From the expression<br />

for the two-loop β-function<br />

μ ∂<br />

∂μ G = β(G)=ε G − 2 3 (25 − c)G2 − 20 3 (25 − c)G3 + ... (3.124)<br />

for c massless real scalar fields minimally coupled to gravity, one computes the roots<br />

β(G c )=0 to obtain the location of the ultraviolet fixed point, and from it on can<br />

then determine the universal exponent ν = −1/β ′ (G c ). One finds<br />

G c =<br />

3<br />

2(25 − c) ε − 45<br />

2(25 − c) 2 ε2 + ...<br />

ν −1 = ε + 15<br />

25 − c ε2 + ... (3.125)<br />

which gives, for pure gravity without matter (c = 0) in four dimensions, to lowest<br />

order ν −1 = 2, and ν −1 ≈ 4.4 at the next order. 2<br />

Also, in general higher order corrections to the results of the linearized renormalization<br />

group equations of Eq. (3.119) are present, which affect the scaling away<br />

from the fixed point. Let us assume that close to the ultraviolet fixed point at G c one<br />

can write for the β-function the following expansion<br />

2 If one does not expand the solution in ε, one finds from the two-loop result ν −1 = 2d −(1/6)(19+<br />

√<br />

60d − 95) which gives a smaller value ≈ 2.8ind = 4, as well as rough estimate of the uncertainty.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!