20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

136 4 Hamiltonian and Wheeler-DeWitt Equation<br />

for discretization are possible. One could discretize the theory from the very beginning,<br />

while it it is still formulated in terms of an action, and introduce for it lapse<br />

and shift functions, extrinsic and intrinsic discrete curvatures, etc. Alternatively one<br />

could try to discretize the continuum Wheeler-deWitt equation directly, a procedure<br />

that makes sense in the lattice formulation, as these equations are still given in<br />

terms of geometric objects, for which the Regge theory is well suited. It is the latter<br />

approach which we will outline here.<br />

The starting point for the following discussion is therefore the Wheeler-DeWitt<br />

equation for pure gravity in the absence of matter, Eq. (4.72),<br />

{<br />

−(16πG) 2 δ 2<br />

G ij,kl (x)<br />

δg ij (x)δg kl (x) − √ g(x) ( 3 R(x) − 2λ )} Ψ[g ij (x)] = 0 ,<br />

(4.168)<br />

and the diffeomorphism constraint of Eq. (4.73),<br />

{<br />

}<br />

δ<br />

2ig ij (x)∇ k (x) Ψ[g ij (x)] = 0 . (4.169)<br />

δg jk (x)<br />

Note that there is a constraint on the state |Ψ〉 at every x, each of the form<br />

Ĥ(x)|Ψ〉 = 0 and Ĥ i (x)|Ψ〉 = 0.<br />

On a simplicial lattice (see Sect. 6.1 for a discussion of the lattice formulation<br />

for gravity) one knows that deformations of the squared edge lengths are linearly<br />

related to deformations of the induced metric, within a given simplex s and based<br />

on a vertex 0, as discussed elsewhere here, for example in Eq. (6.3),<br />

g ij (s) = 1 (<br />

2 l<br />

2<br />

0i + l0 2 j − lij<br />

2 )<br />

. (4.170)<br />

Note that in the following discussion only edges and volumes along the spatial direction<br />

are involved. Furthermore, one can introduce in a natural way a lattice analog<br />

of the DeWitt supermetric of Eq. (4.66), by writing<br />

‖δl 2 ‖ 2 = ∑<br />

ij<br />

G ij (l 2 ) δl 2 i δl 2 j , (4.171)<br />

with the quantity G ij (l 2 ) suitably defined on the space of squared edge lengths<br />

(Lund and Regge, 1974; Hartle, Miller and Williams, 1997). Through a straightforward<br />

exercise of varying the squared volume of a given simplex s in d dimensions<br />

V 2 (s) = ( 1<br />

d!<br />

) 2<br />

detgij [l 2 (s)] , (4.172)<br />

to quadratic order in the metric (on the r.h.s.), or in the squared edge lengths (on the<br />

l.h.s.), one finds the identity<br />

1<br />

V (l 2 ) ∑ ij<br />

∂ 2 V 2 (l 2 )<br />

∂l 2 i ∂l2 j<br />

δl 2 i δl 2 j = 1 d!<br />

√ [ ]<br />

det(g ij ) g ij g kl δg ij δg kl − g ij g kl δg jk δg li<br />

.<br />

(4.173)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!