20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9.2 Effective Field Equations 307<br />

(<br />

I = 1 ∫<br />

dx √ ( ) 1 1/2ν<br />

g 1 − a 0<br />

16πG<br />

ξ 2 + ...)<br />

R . (9.7)<br />

✷<br />

Due to the fractional exponent in general the covariant operator appearing in the<br />

above expression, namely<br />

( ) 1 1/2ν<br />

A(✷) =a 0<br />

ξ 2 , (9.8)<br />

✷<br />

has to be suitably defined by analytic continuation from positive integer powers.<br />

The latter can be done for example by computing ✷ n for positive integer n and<br />

then analytically continuing to n →−1/2ν. Alternatively one can make use of the<br />

identity<br />

1<br />

✷ n<br />

= (−1)n<br />

Γ (n)<br />

∫ ∞<br />

0<br />

dss n−1 exp(is✷) , (9.9)<br />

and later perform the relevant integrals with n → 1/2ν. Other procedures can be<br />

used to define A(✷), for example based on an integral representation involving the<br />

scalar propagator (Lopez Nacir and Mazzitelli, 2007).<br />

It should be stressed here that the action in Eq. (9.7) should be treated as a classical<br />

effective action, with dominant radiative corrections at short distances (r ≪ ξ )<br />

already automatically built in, and for which a restriction to generally smooth field<br />

configurations does make some sense. In particular one would expect that in most<br />

instances it should be possible, as well as meaningful, to neglect terms involving<br />

large numbers of derivatives of the metric in order to compute the effects of the new<br />

contributions appearing in the effective action.<br />

Had one not considered the action of Eq. (9.7) as a starting point for constructing<br />

the effective theory, one would naturally be led [following Eq. (9.3)] to consider the<br />

following effective field equations<br />

R μν − 1 2 g μν R + λ g μν = 8πG [1 + A(✷)] T μν , (9.10)<br />

the argument again being the replacement G → G(✷) ≡ G[1 + A(✷)]. Being manifestly<br />

covariant, these expressions at least satisfy some of the requirements for a<br />

set of consistent field equations incorporating the running of G. The above effective<br />

field equation can in fact be re-cast in a form similar to the classical field equations<br />

R μν − 1 2 g μν R + λ g μν = 8πG ˜T μν , (9.11)<br />

with ˜T μν =[1 + A(✷)] T μν defined as an effective, or gravitationally dressed,<br />

energy-momentum tensor. Just like the ordinary Einstein gravity case, in general<br />

˜T μν might not be covariantly conserved a priori, ∇ μ ˜T μν ≠ 0, but ultimately the<br />

consistency of the effective field equations demands that it be exactly conserved,<br />

in consideration of the Bianchi identity satisfied by the Riemann tensor [a similar<br />

problem arises in other non-local modifications of gravity (Barvinsky, 2003)]. The<br />

ensuing new covariant conservation law

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!