20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8.4 Invariant Correlations at Fixed Geodesic Distance 279<br />

having the two given vertices as endpoints. This can be done at least in principle by<br />

enumerating all paths connecting the two points, and then selecting the shortest one.<br />

Equivalently it can be computed from the scalar field propagator, as in Eq. (6.145).<br />

Consequently physical correlations have to be defined at fixed geodesic distance<br />

d, as in the following correlation between scalar curvatures<br />

∫<br />

<<br />

∫<br />

dx<br />

dy √ gR(x) √ gR(y) δ(|x − y|−d) > . (8.26)<br />

Generally these do not go to zero at large separation, so one needs to define the<br />

connected part, by subtracting out the value at d = ∞. These will be indicated in the<br />

following by the connected c average, and we will write the resulting connected<br />

curvature correlation function at fixed geodesic distance compactly as<br />

G R (d) ∼ < √ gR(x) √ gR(y) δ(|x − y|−d) > c . (8.27)<br />

One can define several more invariant correlation functions at fixed geodesic distance<br />

for other operators involving curvatures (Hamber, 1994). The gravitational<br />

correlation function just defined is similar to the one in non-Abelian gauge theories,<br />

Eq. (3.146).<br />

In the lattice regulated theory one can define similar correlations, using for example<br />

the correspondence of Eqs. (6.38) or (6.110) for the scalar curvature<br />

√ gR(x) → 2 ∑ δ h A h . (8.28)<br />

h⊃x<br />

If the deficit angles are averaged over a number of contiguous hinges h sharing a<br />

common vertex x, one is naturally lead to the connected correlation function<br />

G R (d) ≡ < ∑ δ h A h ∑ δ h ′A h ′ δ(|x − y|−d) > c , (8.29)<br />

h⊃x h ′ ⊃y<br />

which probes correlations in the scalar curvatures. In practice the above lattice correlations<br />

have to be computed by a suitable binning procedure: one averages out all<br />

correlations in a geodesic distance interval [d,d + Δd] with Δd comparable to one<br />

lattice spacing l 0 . See Fig. 8.1. Similarly one can construct the connected correlation<br />

functions for local volumes at fixed geodesic distance<br />

G V (d) ≡ < ∑ V h ∑ V h ′ δ(|x − y|−d) > c . (8.30)<br />

h⊃x h ′ ⊃y<br />

In general one expects for the curvature correlation either a power law decay, for<br />

distances sufficiently larger than the lattice spacing l 0 ,<br />

< √ gR(x) √ gR(y) δ(|x − y|−d) > c ∼<br />

d ≫ l 0<br />

1<br />

d 2n , (8.31)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!