20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.7 Running of α(μ) in Gauge Theories 99<br />

with<br />

for small r, and<br />

e<br />

4π r →<br />

e Q(r) (3.137)<br />

4π r<br />

Q(r) =1 + α<br />

3π ln 1<br />

m 2 + ... mr ≪ 1 (3.138)<br />

r2 Q(r) =1 +<br />

α<br />

4 √ π (mr) 3/2 e−2mr + ... mr ≫ 1 , (3.139)<br />

for large r. Here the normalization is such that the potential at infinity has Q(∞)=<br />

1. 3 The reason we have belabored this example is to show that the screening vacuum<br />

polarization contribution would have dramatic effects in QED if for some reason<br />

the particle running through the fermion loop diagram had a much smaller (or even<br />

close to zero) mass. There are two interesting aspects of the (one-loop) result of<br />

Eqs. (3.138) and (3.139). The first one is that the exponentially small size of the<br />

correction at large r is linked with the fact that the electron mass m e is not too small:<br />

the range of the correction term is ξ = 2¯h/mc = 0.78 × 10 −10 cm, but would have<br />

been much larger if the electron mass had been a lot smaller.<br />

In QCD (and related Yang-Mills theories) radiative corrections are also known to<br />

alter significantly the behavior of the static potential at short distances. The changes<br />

in the potential are best expressed in terms of the running strong coupling constant<br />

α S (μ), whose scale dependence is determined by the celebrated beta function of<br />

SU(3) QCD with n f light fermion flavors<br />

μ ∂α S<br />

∂μ = 2β(α S)=− β 0<br />

2π α2 S − β 1<br />

4π 2 α3 S − β 2<br />

64π 3 α4 S − ... (3.140)<br />

with β 0 = 11− 2 3 n f , β 1 = 51− 19<br />

3 n f , and β 2 = 2857− 5033<br />

9 n f + 325<br />

27 n2 f . The solution<br />

of the renormalization group equation of Eq. (3.140) then gives for the running of<br />

α S (μ)<br />

[<br />

4π<br />

α S (μ) =<br />

β 0 ln μ 2 /Λ 2 1 − 2β 1<br />

ln[ln μ 2 /Λ 2 MS ]<br />

]<br />

β 2 MS 0<br />

ln μ 2 /Λ 2 + ... , (3.141)<br />

MS<br />

(see Fig. 3.8). The non-perturbative scale Λ MS<br />

appears as an integration constant<br />

of the renormalization group equations, and is therefore - by construction - scale<br />

independent. The physical value of Λ MS<br />

cannot be fixed from perturbation theory<br />

alone, and needs to be determined by experiment, giving Λ MS<br />

≃ 220MeV.<br />

In principle one can solve for Λ MS<br />

in terms of the coupling at any scale, and in<br />

particular at the cutoff scale Λ, obtaining<br />

3 The running of the fine structure constant has recently been verified experimentally at LEP. The<br />

scale dependence of the vacuum polarization effects gives a fine structure constant changing from<br />

α(0) ∼ 1/137.036 at atomic distances to about α(m Z0 ) ∼ 1/128.978 at energies comparable to the<br />

Z 0 boson mass, in good agreement with the theoretical renormalization group prediction.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!