20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22 1 Continuum <strong>Formulation</strong><br />

Furthermore, in empty space T μν = 0, which then implies the vanishing of Riemann<br />

there<br />

R μνρσ = 0 (1.114)<br />

As a result in three dimensions classical spacetime is locally flat everywhere outside<br />

a source, gravitational fields do not propagate outside matter, and two bodies cannot<br />

experience any gravitational force: they move uniformly on straight lines.<br />

There cannot be any gravitational waves either: the Weyl tensor which carries information<br />

about gravitational fields not determined locally by matter, vanishes identically<br />

in three dimensions. One further surprising (and disappointing) conclusion<br />

from the previous arguments is that black holes cannot exist in three dimensions,<br />

as spacetime is flat outside matter, which always allows light emitted from a star<br />

to escape to infinity. One interesting case though is three-dimensional anti-DeSitter<br />

space, with a scaled cosmological constant λ = −1/ξ 2 . There one can show that<br />

objects which could be described as black holes exist, with a black hole horizon<br />

in the non-rotating case at r 0 = ξ √ MG, where M is the mass of the collapsed object<br />

(Banados Teitelboim and Zanelli, 1992). Note that in three dimensions G has<br />

dimensions of a length, so that the product MG ends up being dimensionless. The<br />

scale of the horizon is therefore supplied by the scale ξ .<br />

What seems rather puzzling at first is that Newtonian theory seems to make perfect<br />

sense in d = 3. The Newtonian potential is non-vanishing and grows logarithmically<br />

with distance,<br />

∫<br />

V (r) ∝ G d 2 ke ix·k /k 2 ∼ G logr . (1.115)<br />

This can only mean that the Newtonian theory is not recovered in the weak field limit<br />

of the relativistic theory (Deser, Jackiw and Templeton, 1982; Giddings, Abbott and<br />

Kuchar, 1984).<br />

To see this explicitly, it is sufficient to consider the trace-reversed form of the<br />

field equations,<br />

(<br />

R μν = 8πG T μν − 1 )<br />

d − 2 g μν T , (1.116)<br />

with T = T λ λ , in the weak field limit. In the linearized theory, with h μν = g μν −η μν ,<br />

and in the Hilbert-DeDonder gauge<br />

one obtains the wave equation<br />

✷h μν<br />

∇ λ h λ μ − 1 2 ∇ μh λ λ = 0 , (1.117)<br />

= −16πG<br />

(<br />

τ μν − 1 )<br />

d − 2 η μν τ<br />

, (1.118)<br />

with τ μν the linearized stress tensor. After neglecting the spatial components of τ μν<br />

in comparison to the mass density τ 00 , and assuming that the fields are quasi-static,<br />

one obtains a Poisson equation for h 00 ,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!