20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.5 The Gravitational Case 87<br />

× × ×<br />

(a) (b) (c)<br />

Fig. 3.4 One-loop diagrams giving rise to coupling renormalizations in gravity. From left to right,<br />

graviton loop, ghost loop and scalar matter loop.<br />

1<br />

k 2 (δ μαδ νβ + δ μβ δ να ) − 2 1<br />

d − 2 k 2 δ μνδ αβ<br />

(<br />

− 1− 1 ) 1<br />

α k 4 (δ μαk ν k β + δ να k μ k β + δ μβ k ν k α + δ νβ k μ k α )<br />

+ 1 4(β − 1) 1<br />

d − 2 β − 2 k 4 (δ μνk α k β + δ αβ k μ k ν )<br />

[<br />

4(1 − β)<br />

+<br />

(β − 2) 2 2 − 3 − β<br />

]<br />

2(1 − β) 1<br />

−<br />

α d − 2 k 6 k νk ν k α k β .<br />

(3.88)<br />

Normally it would be convenient to choose a gauge α=β = 1, in which case only<br />

the first two terms for the graviton propagator survive. But here it might be advantageous<br />

to leave the two gauge parameters unspecified, so that one can later show<br />

explicitly the gauge independence of the final result. In particular the gauge parameter<br />

β is related to the gauge freedom associated with the possibility, described<br />

above, of rescaling the metric g μν . Note also the presence of kinematical poles in<br />

ε = d − 2 in the second, fourth and fifth term for the graviton propagator.<br />

To illustrate explicitly the mechanism of coupling renormalization, the cosmological<br />

term will be discussed first, since the procedure is a bit simpler. The cosmological<br />

term √ g is first expanded by setting g μν = g μν +h μν with a flat background<br />

g μν = δ μν . One has<br />

√ g = 1 +<br />

1<br />

2<br />

h − 1 4 h μνh μν + 1 8 h2 + O(h 3 ) , (3.89)<br />

with h = h μ μ. Terms linear in the fluctuation h μν are dropped, since in a properly<br />

chosen background such terms are expected to be absent. The one-loop correction<br />

to the 1 term in the above expression is then given by the tadpole diagrams for the<br />

two quadratic terms,<br />

− 1 4 h μνh μν + 1 8 h2 →− 1 4 + 1 8 . (3.90)<br />

These are easily evaluated using the graviton propagator of Eq. (3.88). For the one<br />

loop divergences (see Fig. 3.4) associated with the √ g term one then obtains

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!