20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

140 4 Hamiltonian and Wheeler-DeWitt Equation<br />

{<br />

−ḠΔ q − 1 }<br />

3 R(q)+1 Ψ[q] =0 , (4.181)<br />

Ḡ<br />

with Δ q a discretized form of the covariant Laplacian, acting locally on the function<br />

space of the q = l 2 variables; on near-transverse traceless modes it is expected to<br />

have positive eigenvalues. Furthermore, at this point the similarity with the lattice<br />

Hamiltonian for non-abelian gauge theories in Eq. (4.157) has become evident.<br />

Due to the triangle inequalities, finding a solution of Eq. (4.180) for all lattice<br />

points might not be easy; in principle it could be done numerically. For N lattice q<br />

variables, the solution for Ψ(q) is expected to be in general a linear combination of<br />

N wave functions. But if one is only interested in the lowest p 2 ≈ 0 excitations of the<br />

theory, one could perhaps approximate the Laplacian term by its lowest eigenvalue<br />

∼ (π/L) 2 where L is the linear size of the spatial system (for a spatial volume 3 V<br />

one would use L ≃ ( 3 V ) 1/3 ). Furthermore the local three-curvature operator 3 R(q)<br />

involves an elementary loop on the lattice, with size of the order of the average<br />

lattice spacing l 0 . From dimensional arguments one would expect this term on the<br />

average to contribute 3 R ≃ c 0 /l 2 0 + c 1/L 2 , the first piece representing a subtraction,<br />

and the second one a correction dependent on the boundary conditions in x. Inserting<br />

this expression into Eq. (4.181) one finds<br />

c 0 = l 2 0 Ḡ c 1 = π 2 Ḡ 2 . (4.182)<br />

The first condition amounts to requiring a critical value for Ḡ, reminiscent of the<br />

ultraviolet fixed point condition for G in the 2 + ε expansion. If the theory develops<br />

self-consistently a non-perturbative scale ξ by a mechanism analogous to dimensional<br />

transmutation, then one would replace L → ξ in the above expressions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!