20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

284 8 Numerical Studies<br />

task, since at large distance the correlations are small and the statistical noise becomes<br />

large. Still, the first results (Hamber and Williams, 1995) suggest that the<br />

potential has more or less the expected classical form in the vicinity of the critical<br />

point, both as far as the mass dependence and perhaps even the distance dependence<br />

are concerned. In particular it is attractive.<br />

8.6 Scaling in the Vicinity of the Critical Point<br />

In practice the correlation functions at fixed geodesic distance are difficult to compute<br />

numerically, and therefore not the best route to study the critical properties.<br />

But scaling arguments allow one to determine the scaling behavior of correlation<br />

functions from critical exponents characterizing the singular behavior of the free<br />

energy and various local averages in the vicinity of the critical point. In general a<br />

divergence of the correlation length ξ<br />

ξ (k) ≡ ∼<br />

k→k c<br />

A ξ |k c − k| −ν , (8.50)<br />

signals the presence of a phase transition, and leads to the appearance of a singularity<br />

in the free energy F(k). The scaling assumption for the free energy postulates<br />

that a divergent correlation length in the vicinity of the critical point at k c leads to<br />

non-analyticities of the type<br />

F ≡− 1 V lnZ = F reg + F sing<br />

F sing ∼ ξ −d , (8.51)<br />

where the second relationship follows simply from dimensional arguments (the free<br />

energy is an extensive quantity). The regular part F reg is generally not determined<br />

from ξ by purely dimensional considerations, but as the name implies is a regular<br />

function in the vicinity of the critical point. Combining the definition of ν in<br />

Eq. (8.50) with the scaling assumption of Eq. (8.51) one obtains<br />

F sing (k)<br />

∼<br />

k→k c<br />

(const.)|k c − k| dν . (8.52)<br />

The presence of a phase transition can then be inferred from non-analytic terms in<br />

invariant averages, such as the average curvature and its fluctuation. For the average<br />

curvature one obtains<br />

R(k) ∼ A R |k c − k| dν−1 , (8.53)<br />

k→k c<br />

up to regular contributions (i.e. constant terms in the vicinity of k c ). An additive<br />

constant can be added, but numerical evidence sor far points to this constant being<br />

consistent with zero. Similarly one has for the curvature fluctuation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!