20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

154 5 Semiclassical Gravity<br />

essentially non-perturbative, and non-analytic in the external field perturbation E.<br />

Furthermore, a comparison of the exact answer in Eq. (5.61) with the WKB result<br />

of Eq. (5.54) shows that the latter only gives the leading term in an infinite series of<br />

progressively smaller contribution.<br />

The result obtained for electrons and positrons in strong uniform electric fields<br />

are clearly not transferable as is to the gravitational case. For once, there is no notion<br />

of oppositely charged particles in gravity. Thus the naive replacement |eE|→<br />

m/4MG for a particle-antiparticle pair, say close to the horizon of a black hole, does<br />

not seem to make much sense. Yet the strong electric field QED calculation shows<br />

that quantum mechanical tunneling events can take place, and that their effects can<br />

be computed to first order using the WKB approximation. A second lesson from<br />

QED is that in general higher order corrections should be expected.<br />

5.4 Black Hole Particle Emission<br />

Originally quantum gravitational effects for black holes were ignored, since the radius<br />

of curvature outside the black hole is much larger than the Planck length, the<br />

length scale on which one would expect quantum fluctuations of the metric to become<br />

important. If the gravitational field is able to create locally virtual pairs, the<br />

local energy density associated with such a pair would be much smaller than the<br />

energy scale associated with the local curvature. It can be shown though that in the<br />

vicinity of a black hole horizon particle production is possible, due to vacuum fluctuations<br />

and tunneling. The resulting effects add up over time, are therefore macroscopic<br />

and could in principle be observable.<br />

Normally when describing a stationary non-rotating black hole one uses the<br />

Schwarzschild metric in standard form<br />

ds 2 = −<br />

(<br />

1 − 2GM<br />

r<br />

)<br />

dt 2 +<br />

(<br />

1 − 2MG<br />

r<br />

) −1<br />

dr 2 + r 2 dΩ 2 2 , (5.62)<br />

with dΩ2 2 ≡ dθ 2 + sin 2 θdφ 2 . The metric shows a singularity at r = 2MG. Since<br />

none of the curvature invariants are singular on the horizon r = 2MG, one would<br />

expect the singularity to be perhaps an artifact of the coordinate system, here most<br />

suitably describing the viewpoint of an observer stationary at infinity. On the other<br />

hand a freely falling observer is expected to pass initially unscathed through the<br />

black hole horizon, and indeed a singularity-free coordinate system can be found describing<br />

such an observer (Kruskal, 1960). In these new coordinates, defined by the<br />

transformation from the original Schwarzschild coordinates (r,θ,φ,t) → (r ′ ,θ,φ,t ′ )<br />

(<br />

r ′ 2 − t<br />

′2 = T<br />

2 r<br />

) ( r<br />

)<br />

2GM − 1 exp<br />

2GM<br />

2r ′ t ′ ( t<br />

)<br />

r ′2 + t ′ 2 = tanh , (5.63)<br />

2GM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!