20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

280 8 Numerical Studies<br />

Fig. 8.1 Geodesic distance<br />

and correlations. On each<br />

metric configuration correlation<br />

functions are computed<br />

for lattice vertices within<br />

the physical distance range<br />

[d,d + Δd].<br />

o<br />

with n some exponent characterizing the power law decay, or at very large distances<br />

an exponential decay, characterized by a correlation length ξ ,<br />

< √ gR(x) √ gR(y) δ(|x − y|−d) > c ∼<br />

d ≫ ξ<br />

e −d/ξ . (8.32)<br />

In fact the invariant correlation length ξ is generally defined (in analogy with what<br />

one does for other theories) through the long-distance decay of the connected, invariant<br />

correlations at fixed geodesic distance d. In the pure power law decay case<br />

of Eq. (8.31) the correlation length ξ is of course infinite. One can show from scaling<br />

considerations (see below) that the power n in Eq. (8.31) is related to the critical<br />

exponent ν by n = 4 − 1/ν.<br />

In the presence of a finite correlation length ξ one needs therefore to carefully<br />

distinguish between the “short distance” regime<br />

where Eq. (8.31) is valid, and the “long distance” regime<br />

l 0 ≪ d ≪ ξ , (8.33)<br />

ξ ≪ d ≪ L , (8.34)<br />

where Eq. (8.32) is appropriate. Here l 0 = √ < l 2 > is the average lattice spacing,<br />

and L = V 1/4 the linear size of the system.<br />

Recently the issue of defining diffeomorphism invariant correlations in quantum<br />

gravity has been re-examined from a new perspective (Giddings, Marolf and Hartle,<br />

2006).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!