20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

148 5 Semiclassical Gravity<br />

with TT quadratic action<br />

Î 2 (π TT ,h TT )=− 1 ∫<br />

16πG<br />

(<br />

)<br />

d 4 x π ij<br />

TT ∂ th TT<br />

ij − H T [π TT ,h TT ]<br />

. (5.27)<br />

After assuming a canonical measure ∏(dpdq/2π ¯h) over the conjugate variables<br />

π ij<br />

TT<br />

and hTT ij , and integrating out the momenta π ij<br />

TT<br />

, one finally obtains the simple<br />

result<br />

∫ {<br />

P[a] = [dh TT<br />

μν] exp − 1 ∫<br />

d 4 x √ }<br />

gh TT μν ∇<br />

32πG<br />

λ ∇ λ h TT<br />

μν . (5.28)<br />

Note that the last expression has been re-written in terms of purely TT components<br />

h TT μν of the original four-metric perturbation in Eq. (5.10). Since physical perturbations<br />

of the metric are known to be transverse-traceless (associated with a particle<br />

of zero mass and spin two) the result is not surprising, and in fact has wider applicability<br />

to the semiclassical expansion, beyond the simple choice for background<br />

metric implicit in Eq. (5.21).<br />

Formally, the Gaussian integration over the h TT variables gives<br />

( )<br />

P[a] =det −1/2 −∇ λ ∇ λ<br />

4π lP 2 , (5.29)<br />

μ2<br />

where μ is a parameter with units of inverse length, and lP 2 = 16πG. The specific<br />

power of μ appearing in this last expression actually depends on the details of the<br />

measure [dh TT<br />

μν], which will be discussed further below.<br />

The determinant in Eq. (5.29) is fomally defined through an infinite product of<br />

eigenvalues λ n of the Laplacian ∇ λ ∇ λ satisfying Dirichlet boundary conditions,<br />

det<br />

−∇ λ ∇ λ φ (n)<br />

μν<br />

)<br />

(−μ 2 ∇ λ ∇ λ<br />

= λ n φ (n)<br />

μν (5.30)<br />

→ ∏(μ 2 λ n ) . (5.31)<br />

n<br />

But the product is expected to be divergent and needs to be regularized. One way of<br />

doing it is to define a zeta-function sum over eigenvalues (Hawking, 1976)<br />

ζ (s) ≡ ∑<br />

n<br />

1<br />

λ s n<br />

, (5.32)<br />

so that formally on obtains<br />

( )<br />

( )<br />

− 1 2 logdet −∇ λ ∇ λ = − 1 2 trlog −∇ λ ∇ λ = − 1 2 ∑logλ n = 1 2 ζ ′ (0) , (5.33)<br />

with ζ ′ (0) ≡ dζ /ds| s=0 . For the wave function P[a] itself one then has<br />

n

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!