20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20 1 Continuum <strong>Formulation</strong><br />

terms of the type ∇ 4 R, R∇ 2 R and R 3 . It can be shown that the first class of terms<br />

reduce to total derivatives, and that the second class of terms can also be made to<br />

vanish on shell by using the Bianchi identity. Out of the last set of terms, the R 3 ones,<br />

one can show (’t Hooft, 2002) that there are potentially 20 distinct contributions, of<br />

which 19 vanish on shell (i.e. by using the tree level field equations R μν = 0). An<br />

explicit calculation then shows that a new non-removable on-shell R 3 -type divergence<br />

arises in pure gravity at two loops (Goroff and Sagnotti, 1985; van de Ven,<br />

1992) from the only possible surviving non-vanishing counterterm, namely<br />

ΔL (2) =<br />

√ g<br />

(16π 2 ) 2 (d − 4)<br />

209<br />

2880 R μν<br />

ρσ<br />

Rρσ<br />

κλ R μν<br />

κλ<br />

. (1.105)<br />

To summarize, radiative corrections to pure Einstein gravity without a cosmological<br />

constant term induce one-loop R 2 -type divergences of the form<br />

Γ (1)<br />

div<br />

= 1 ∫<br />

¯h<br />

d − 4 16π 2 d 4 x √ ( 7<br />

g<br />

20 R μν R μν + 1 )<br />

120 R2 , (1.106)<br />

and a two-loop non-removable on-shell R 3 -type divergence of the type<br />

Γ (2)<br />

div<br />

= 1<br />

d − 4<br />

209<br />

2880<br />

¯h 2 ∫<br />

G<br />

(16π 2 ) 2<br />

d 4 x √ gR ρσ<br />

μν<br />

Rρσ<br />

κλ R μν<br />

κλ<br />

, (1.107)<br />

which present an almost insurmountable obstacle to the traditional perturbative<br />

renormalization procedure in four dimensions.<br />

∫<br />

d 4 x √ gR μναβ R αβρσ R ρσκλ R κλμν . (1.108)<br />

Again on-shell all other invariants can be shown to be proportional to this one. One<br />

can therefore attempt to summarize the situation so far as follows:<br />

◦ In principle perturbation theory in G in provides a clear, covariant framework in<br />

which radiative corrections to gravity can be computed in a systematic loop expansion.<br />

The effects of a possibly non-trivial gravitational measure do not show<br />

up at any order in the weak field expansion, and radiative corrections affecting<br />

the renormalization of the cosmological constant, proportional to δ d (0), are set<br />

to zero in dimensional regularization.<br />

◦ At the same time at every order in the loop expansion new invariant terms involving<br />

higher derivatives of the metric are generated, whose effects cannot simply<br />

be absorbed into a re-definition of the original couplings. As expected on the basis<br />

of power-counting arguments, the theory is not perturbatively renormalizable<br />

in the traditional sense in four dimensions (although it seems to fail this test by a<br />

small measure in lowest order perturbation theory).<br />

◦ The standard approach based on a perturbative expansion of the pure Einstein<br />

theory in four dimensions is therefore not convergent (it is in fact badly divergent),<br />

and represents therefore a temporary dead end.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!