20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9.5 Cosmological Solutions 317<br />

which is the Robertson-Walker metric form of Eq. (9.47). If one assumes for the<br />

matter density ρ(t) ∼ ρ 0 t β , then matching powers when the new term starts to take<br />

over at larger distances gives the first result<br />

β = −2 − 1/ν . (9.62)<br />

Thus the density decreases faster in time than the classical value (β = −2) would<br />

indicate. The expansion appears therefore to be accelerating, but before reaching<br />

such a conclusion one needs to determine the time dependence of the scale factor<br />

a(t) (or α) as well.<br />

One can alternatively pursue the following exercise in order to check the overall<br />

consistency of the approach. Consider ✷ n acting on Tμ<br />

μ = −ρ(t) instead, as in the<br />

trace of the effective field equation of Eq. (9.47)<br />

R = −8πG [1 + A(✷)] T μ<br />

μ , (9.63)<br />

for λ = 0 and p(t)=0. For ρ(t)=ρ 0 t β and a(t)=r 0 t α one finds in this case<br />

✷ n [−ρ(t)] → 4 n (−1) n+1 Γ ( β β+3α+1<br />

2<br />

+ 1)Γ (<br />

2<br />

)<br />

Γ ( β β+3α+1<br />

2<br />

+ 1 − n)Γ (<br />

2<br />

− n) ρ 0 t β−2n , (9.64)<br />

which again implies for n →−1/2ν the value β = −2 − 1/ν as in Eq. (9.62) for<br />

large(r) times, when the quantum correction starts to become important (since the<br />

l.h.s. of Einstein’s equation always goes like 1/t 2 , no matter what the value for α is,<br />

at least for k=0).<br />

The next step is to examine the full effective field equations (as opposed to just<br />

their trace part) of Eq. (9.13) with cosmological constant λ = 0,<br />

Here the d’Alembertian operator<br />

acts on a second rank tensor,<br />

R μν − 1 2 g μν R = 8πG [1 + A(✷)] T μν . (9.65)<br />

✷ = g μν ∇ μ ∇ ν , (9.66)<br />

∇ ν T αβ = ∂ ν T αβ −Γ λ<br />

ανT λβ −Γ λ<br />

βν T αλ ≡ I ναβ<br />

( )<br />

∇ μ ∇ν T αβ = ∂μ I ναβ −ΓνμI λ<br />

λαβ −ΓαμI λ<br />

νλβ −Γβμ λ I ναλ , (9.67)<br />

and would thus seem to require the calculation of 1920 terms, of which fortunately<br />

many vanish by symmetry. Next one assumes again that T μν has the perfect fluid<br />

form, for which one obtains from the action of ✷ on T μν<br />

(ȧ(t) )<br />

( )<br />

2<br />

✷Tμν = 6 [ρ(t)+p(t)] − 3 ˙ρ(t) ȧ(t)<br />

tt<br />

a(t)<br />

a(t) − ¨ρ(t)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!