20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.3 Wave Equation 9<br />

with<br />

s μν = 1 d η μν ∂ · ε<br />

a μν = 1 2 (∂ με ν − ∂ ν ε μ )<br />

t μν = 1 2 (∂ μ ε ν + ∂ ν ε μ − 2 d η μν ∂ · ε) . (1.53)<br />

Then s μν (x) can be thought of describing local scale transformations, a μν (x) is<br />

written in terms of an antisymmeric tensor and therefore describes local rotations,<br />

while t μν (x) contains a traceless symmetric tensor and describes local shears.<br />

Since both the scalar curvature R(x) and the volume element dx √ g(x) are separately<br />

invariant under the general coordinate transformations of Eqs. (1.48) and<br />

(1.50), both of the following action contributions are acceptable<br />

∫<br />

dx √ g(x)<br />

∫<br />

dx √ g(x) R(x) , (1.54)<br />

the first being known as the cosmological constant contribution (as it represents the<br />

total space-time volume). In the weak field limit, the first, cosmological constant<br />

term involves<br />

√ g = 1 +<br />

1<br />

2<br />

hμ<br />

μ + 1 8 h μ μ hν ν − 1 4 h μνh μν + O(h 3 ) , (1.55)<br />

which is easily obtained from the matrix formula<br />

√<br />

detg = exp(<br />

1<br />

2<br />

trlng)=exp[ 1 2<br />

trln(η + h)] , (1.56)<br />

after expanding out the exponential in powers of h μν . We have also reverted here to<br />

the more traditional way of performing the weak field expansion (i.e. without factors<br />

of κ),<br />

g μν = η μν + h μν<br />

g μν = η μν − h μν + h α<br />

μ h αν + ... (1.57)<br />

with η μν the flat metric. The reason why such a √ g cosmological constant term<br />

was not originally included in the construction of the Lagrangian of Eq. (1.7) is that<br />

it does not contain derivatives of the h μν field. It is in a sense analogous to a mass<br />

term, but does have the very important property that it does not break the local gauge<br />

invariance.<br />

This is a good place to discuss another issue. There is an old question of whether<br />

the graviton is exactly massless, or whether it has possibly a very small mass m.<br />

It is clear that the mass has to be very small, otherwise it would cause observable<br />

deviations from the Newtonian potential used to describe successfully large galactic<br />

cluster scales. In principle there are a number of well known problems that arise<br />

when a (Pauli-Fierz) spin-two mass term

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!