20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.9 Connection with the <strong>Feynman</strong> <strong>Path</strong> <strong>Integral</strong> 117<br />

as well as Eqs. (4.77) and (4.78). It was DeWitt who first showed that these are<br />

equivalent to the Schrödinger equation for quantized matter field in a classical gravitational<br />

background g ij (x),<br />

i ∂ ∂t Φ(t) =Ĥφ [g ij ]Φ(t) , (4.83)<br />

with a background g ij -dependent matter field Hamiltonian<br />

∫<br />

}<br />

Ĥ φ [g ij ]= d 3 x<br />

{N(x)Ĥ φ (x)+N i (x)Ĥ φ i (x) . (4.84)<br />

A discussion on how the Wheeler-deWitt equation and its semiclassical expansion<br />

relate to the conventional covariant <strong>Feynman</strong> diagram picture can be found<br />

in (Barvinsky and Kiefer, 1998; Barvinsky, 1998).<br />

4.9 Connection with the <strong>Feynman</strong> <strong>Path</strong> <strong>Integral</strong><br />

In principle any solution of the Wheeler-deWitt equation corresponds to a possible<br />

quantum state of the universe. It is also clear the effects of the boundary conditions<br />

on the wavefunction will act to severely restrict the class of possible solutions. In<br />

ordinary quantum mechanics these are determined by the physical context of the<br />

problem and some set of external conditions. In the case of the universe as a whole<br />

the situation is less clear, and in many approaches some suitable set of boundary<br />

conditions are postulated instead, based on general arguments involving concepts<br />

such as simplicity or economy.<br />

One proposal (Hartle and Hawking, 1983) is to restrict the quantum state of the<br />

universe by requiring that the wave function Ψ be determined by a path integral over<br />

compact Euclidean metrics. The wave function would then be given by<br />

∫<br />

Ψ[g ij ,φ] = [dg μν ][dφ] exp ( −Î[g μν ,φ] ) , (4.85)<br />

where Î is the Euclidean action for gravity plus matter<br />

Î = − 1 ∫<br />

16πG<br />

d 4 x √ g(R − 2λ) − 1 ∫<br />

8πG<br />

d 3 x √ ∫<br />

g ij K −<br />

d 4 x √ gL m . (4.86)<br />

The functional integral would be restricted to those four-metrics which have the induced<br />

metric g ij and the matter field φ as given on the boundary surface S. One<br />

would expect, as is already the case in non-relativistic quantum mechanics where<br />

the path integral with a boundary surface satisfies the Schrödinger equation (<strong>Feynman</strong><br />

and Hibbs, 1963), that the wavefunction constructed in this way would also<br />

automatically satisfy the Wheeler-DeWitt equation. In (Hartle and Hawking, 1983)<br />

this is shown to be indeed the case.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!