20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.2 Perturbatively Non-renormalizable Theories: The Sigma Model 75<br />

unambiguous), then the calculable constant relating m to g in Eq. (3.29) uniquely<br />

determines the coefficient a 0 in Eq. (3.22). For example, in the large N limit the<br />

value for a 0 will be given later in Eq. (3.60).<br />

In general one can write down the complete renormalization group equations<br />

for the cutoff-dependent n-point functions Γ (n) (p i ,g,h,Λ) (Brezin and Zinn-Justin,<br />

1976; Zinn-Justin, 2002). For this purpose one needs to define the renormalized<br />

truncated n-point function Γ (n)<br />

r ,<br />

Γ (n)<br />

r (p i ,g r ,h r , μ)=Z n/2 (Λ/μ,g)Γ (n) (p i ,g,h,Λ) , (3.30)<br />

where μ is a renormalization scale, and the constants g r , h r and Z are defined by<br />

g =(Λ/μ) d−2 Z g g r π(x)=Z 1/2 π r (x)<br />

h = Z h h r Z h = Z g / √ Z . (3.31)<br />

The requirement that the renormalized n-point function Γ r<br />

(n) be independent of the<br />

cutoff Λ then implies<br />

[<br />

Λ ∂<br />

∂Λ + β(g) ∂<br />

∂g − n 2 ζ (g)+ρ(g)h ∂ ]<br />

Γ (n) (p i ,g,h,Λ)=0 , (3.32)<br />

∂h<br />

with the renormalization group functions β(g), ζ (g) and ρ(g) defined as<br />

Λ ∂<br />

∂Λ | ren.fixed g = β(g)<br />

Λ ∂<br />

∂Λ | ren.fixed (−lnZ) =ζ (g)<br />

2 − d + 1 2 ζ (g)+β(g) g<br />

= ρ(g) . (3.33)<br />

Here the derivatives of the bare coupling g,oftheπ-field wave function renormalization<br />

constant Z and of the external field h with respect to the cutoff Λ are evaluated<br />

at fixed renormalized (or effective) coupling, at the renormalization scale μ.<br />

To determine the renormalization group functions β(g), ζ (g) and ρ(g) one can<br />

in fact follow a related but equivalent procedure, in which, instead of requiring the<br />

to be independent of the cutoff Λ at fixed renormalization<br />

scale μ as in Eq. (3.33), one imposes that the bare n-point functions<br />

Γ (n) be independent of the renormalization scale μ at fixed cutoff Λ. One can show<br />

(Brezin, Le Guillou and Zinn-Justin, 1976) that the resulting renormalization group<br />

functions are identical to the previous ones, and that one can obtain the scale dependence<br />

of the couplings [i.e. β(g)] either way. Physically the latter way of thinking<br />

is perhaps more suited to a situation where one is dealing with a finite cutoff theory,<br />

where the ultraviolet cutoff Λ is fixed and one wants to investigate the scale<br />

(momentum) dependence of the couplings, for example g(k 2 ).<br />

renormalized n-point functions Γ (n)<br />

r

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!