20.01.2015 Views

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

Feynman Path Integral Formulation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.11 Solution of Simple Minisuperspace Models 123<br />

“light cone” y ≈|x|, and one possible choice is Ψ = 1. Presumably a better procedure<br />

would be an approximate determination in this region of Ψ via an Euclidean<br />

functional integral. The qualitative behavior of the solutions in general depends crucially<br />

on whether one is in the region V < 0 (where the solution Ψ increases exponentially)<br />

or in the region V > 0 (where the solution for Ψ is oscillatory). From<br />

the nature of the solution and its semiclassical correspondence it has been argued<br />

that the behavior close to y = |x| (a = 0 in the original variable) is consistent with<br />

a minimum radius or “bounce” at V = 0 (Hawking and Wu, 1984; Ochiai and Sato,<br />

2000).<br />

How do the properties of the solutions to the Wheeler-DeWitt equation applied to<br />

minisuperspace models depend on additional terms that might enter into the original<br />

gravitational action To answer this question, one could consider the addition of<br />

higher derivative terms, such as<br />

Î = − 1 ∫<br />

d 4 x √ g [ R − α C μνρσ C μνρσ + β R 2] + s.t. , (4.111)<br />

16πG<br />

where C μνρσ is the Weyl tensor, and “s.t.” refers to surface terms (Hawking and<br />

Luttrell, 1984a,b). Following a procedure analogous to the one discussed in the<br />

previous case, one obtains for a homogeneous isotropic universe the following<br />

Wheeler-DeWitt equation for Ψ(a,R), or, more conveniently, for Ψ(x,y)<br />

[<br />

1 ∂<br />

2<br />

2 ∂y 2 − ∂ 2 ]<br />

∂x 2 + V (x,y) Ψ(x,y) =0 , (4.112)<br />

now with “potential” V<br />

V (x,y) =x 2 − y 2 + gx 2 (x − y) 2 , (4.113)<br />

with g ≡ 1/18πβ, and variables x and y given by x = 2βaR and y = 2a(1 + βR),<br />

where R is the scalar curvature.<br />

As in the previous example, one is interested in a solution for a > 0 which corresponds<br />

to y > x, with boundary condition Ψ(x = y)=1(seeFig.4.2).Butthisis<br />

not sufficient to determine the Cauchy data, and one has to make some additional<br />

guess on what a semiclassical wavefunction might look like in the vicinity of x = y<br />

or x = −y, which suggests<br />

Ψ(y = −x) =exp(−a 4 /36πβ) . (4.114)<br />

These conditions are then in principle sufficient to determine the wavefunction<br />

Ψ(x,y).<br />

Physically the oscillatory behavior of the wavefunction then suggests the existence<br />

of small amplitude oscillations superimposed on an overall expansion or<br />

contraction. These oscillations in radius would cause particle creation in any matter<br />

fields present, which in turn would damp the oscillation.<br />

As one last illustrative example consider a minisuperspace model for a universe<br />

filled with matter (or radiation) of uniform density, such that ρ(a)=M/a σ where<br />

σ = 3 (matter) or 4 (radiation); σ = 0 would correspond to a pure vacuum energy.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!