11.07.2015 Views

U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy - Joint Ocean Commission Initiative

U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy - Joint Ocean Commission Initiative

U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy - Joint Ocean Commission Initiative

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 17.1 Great Lakes States Take Lead in ImplementingAquatic Invasive Species Management PlansSt. Croix Natural Scenic RiverwayInterstate Management PlanLake Champlain BasinInterstate Management Plan■ States with approved plans■ States with plans underdevelopment■ States without plans● Interstate plansAlaska Hawaii Puerto RicoThe Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force encourages states to develop management plans fordetecting and m<strong>on</strong>itoring aquatic invasive species, educating the public, and encouragingcollaborative mitigati<strong>on</strong> efforts. Of the fourteen states that currently have plans approved by theTask Force, six border the Great Lakes. And while other coastal states such as California, Texas,Louisiana, and Florida are developing plans, the majority of East Coast states are not currentlypursuing aquatic nuisance species management plans.Source: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arlingt<strong>on</strong>, VA.Guard has established regulati<strong>on</strong>s and guidelines to address introducti<strong>on</strong>s of n<strong>on</strong>-nativespecies through the uptake and discharge of ballast water from ships.Resource allocati<strong>on</strong> for managing invasive species varies widely am<strong>on</strong>g federal, state,and local agencies. While NANPCA authorizes federal funding to help states implementtheir approved Aquatic Nuisance Species Management Plans, the appropriati<strong>on</strong> has historicallybeen substantially less than the authorizati<strong>on</strong> and has not been effective in motivatingstates to complete management plans. Since 1996, when this provisi<strong>on</strong> was includedin NANPCA, <strong>on</strong>ly fourteen states have established plans (Figure 17.1).NANPCA also encourages the formati<strong>on</strong> of regi<strong>on</strong>al panels, which operate undergoals outlined in the Act. The panels develop priorities and working groups to exploreinvasive species issues applicable to their areas and make recommendati<strong>on</strong>s for regi<strong>on</strong>alacti<strong>on</strong>. Six regi<strong>on</strong>al panels have been established (Figure 17.2).The Nati<strong>on</strong>al Invasive Species Council, c<strong>on</strong>sisting of ten federal departments andagencies, was established by executive order in February 1999 to provide nati<strong>on</strong>al leadership<strong>on</strong> managing terrestrial and aquatic invasive species. In 2001, the Council produceda management plan with significant input from a n<strong>on</strong>federal advisory committee. 7The Lacey Act allows the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) to regulate the importati<strong>on</strong>of animals found to be injurious to wildlife. However, the Act is more often used to254 A N O CEAN B LUEPRINT FOR THE 21ST C ENTURY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!