11.07.2015 Views

U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy - Joint Ocean Commission Initiative

U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy - Joint Ocean Commission Initiative

U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy - Joint Ocean Commission Initiative

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES ANDSUBCOMMITTEES WITH JURISDICTIONOVER OCEAN AND COASTAL ISSUESThe primary instituti<strong>on</strong>s for policy and legislativedevelopment in C<strong>on</strong>gress are the standing committeesof the House and Senate. As the level ofassertiveness of C<strong>on</strong>gress has fluctuated over theyears, its committee structure and power have alsobeen subject to change. C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al policy activismof the 1970s and 1980s, for example, resulted in theproliferati<strong>on</strong> of the number of standing committeesand subcommittees in both chambers. In the 100thC<strong>on</strong>gress (1987–88), there were over 280 permanentjurisdicti<strong>on</strong>al entities in the House and Senate.Reform in the mid-1990s realigned and c<strong>on</strong>solidateda significant porti<strong>on</strong> of the committee system; in the108th C<strong>on</strong>gress (2003–04), there are slightly morethan 200 standing committees and subcommittees.Despite the reducti<strong>on</strong> in the number of jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>alentities overall, the legislative and oversightresp<strong>on</strong>sibilities with respect to ocean and coastalissues in the United States C<strong>on</strong>gress are spread acrossmore than <strong>on</strong>e-quarter of its committees and subcommittees.Some panels exercise more direct and broaderjurisdicti<strong>on</strong> over ocean policy than others, but alllisted in this appendix have an important role in thecollective and cumulative programmatic and budgetarydecisi<strong>on</strong>s of C<strong>on</strong>gress that define such policy.It should be noted that the following identificati<strong>on</strong>and characterizati<strong>on</strong> of c<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al committeeocean policy jurisdicti<strong>on</strong> in the 108th C<strong>on</strong>gress isnot intended to be authoritative. Committee jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>,although defined by the rules of each chamber,is an evolving c<strong>on</strong>cept affected by years of bill referralprecedents and changing procedures occasi<strong>on</strong>edby periodic reorganizati<strong>on</strong> and reform efforts. At aminimum, practically every C<strong>on</strong>gress experiencessome realignment in the subcommittee structure of<strong>on</strong>e or more standing committees.The built-in tensi<strong>on</strong> in the modern-day C<strong>on</strong>gressbetween its representati<strong>on</strong>al role and agenda-settingand legislative resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities affect many differentc<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al processes, including the policy coherenceof its committee structure. This appendix isillustrative of the breadth of committee and subcommitteeinvolvement in ocean and coastal policy oversightand management in the 108th C<strong>on</strong>gress. Thecurrent distributi<strong>on</strong> of authority over the laws andpolicies of the nati<strong>on</strong>’s ocean and coastal activitiesam<strong>on</strong>g a broad suite of fifty-eight c<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al committeesand subcommittees highlights the difficultyof policy coordinati<strong>on</strong> in the legislative branch of thefederal government similar, perhaps, to that experiencedin the executive branch.In additi<strong>on</strong> to the jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>al entities listedbelow, there are other standing committees in theSenate and House that indirectly impact ocean andcoastal policy through important legislative authorityover broader governmental and cross-cutting issues,such as: executive branch organizati<strong>on</strong>; taxes, customs,duties, and trade policies; health sciences;Indian affairs; labor standards and safety regulati<strong>on</strong>s;and other related matters.There have been efforts from time to time to bettercoordinate ocean policy development in C<strong>on</strong>gress.In the 1970s, a temporary select committee composedof members from the various standing units of jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>was established in the House to rewrite thefederal offshore oil and gas law. Also, around the sametime, the Senate authorized the CommerceCommittee to establish the Nati<strong>on</strong>al <strong>Ocean</strong> <strong>Policy</strong>Study (NOPS), a n<strong>on</strong>-legislative cross-Senate entitythat included ex officio representati<strong>on</strong> by Membersfrom other committees with similar jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>alinterests. Operated in many ways as a broad oceanpolicy oversight subcommittee, NOPS has been inactivesince 1994. A more recent initiative was theestablishment in the 106th C<strong>on</strong>gress of the House<strong>Ocean</strong>s Caucus, composed of a broad bipartisanmembership of the House of Representatives. Likeother c<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al caucuses, it possesses no legislativeauthority but provides a voice within the Housefor Members interested in ocean and coastal issues.F 2A N O CEAN B LUEPRINT FOR THE 21ST C ENTURY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!