11.07.2015 Views

U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy - Joint Ocean Commission Initiative

U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy - Joint Ocean Commission Initiative

U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy - Joint Ocean Commission Initiative

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Major c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s from Table C.5 include:• The coastal states account for about three quartersof the U.S. ec<strong>on</strong>omy measured by employmentand value added in 2000.• The proporti<strong>on</strong> of the U.S. ec<strong>on</strong>omy in thecoastal states increased from 1990 to 2000.• Coastal watershed counties account for justunder half of the U.S. ec<strong>on</strong>omy and coastal z<strong>on</strong>ecounties for about <strong>on</strong>e-third of the ec<strong>on</strong>omy.• All of the tiers of the coast, from the near shorearea to the coastal states, grew faster than theU.S. ec<strong>on</strong>omy over the past decade.• With 4.6% of the U.S. land area, the coastal nearshore regi<strong>on</strong> had more than 11% of the U.S.ec<strong>on</strong>omy in 2000.• The near shore area was also the fastest growingarea of the coast from 1990 to 2000, which grewfaster in employment, wages, and value addedthan coastal z<strong>on</strong>e or coastal watershed counties.This comparatively rapid growth in the ec<strong>on</strong>omyof the near shore area is in marked c<strong>on</strong>trast to therelatively slower growth of the populati<strong>on</strong> in this area,suggesting the socio-ec<strong>on</strong>omic pressures <strong>on</strong> the nearshore area arise from more than populati<strong>on</strong> growth.From 1990–2000, the populati<strong>on</strong> of the near shoreregi<strong>on</strong> grew by 3.6 milli<strong>on</strong> (see Table C.1), but thenumber of jobs grew by more than 3.8 milli<strong>on</strong>.In sum, the ec<strong>on</strong>omic trends over the pastdecade have generally shown greater emphasis <strong>on</strong>coastal regi<strong>on</strong>s, with the fastest growth occurring inthe areas near the shore. While much of the discussi<strong>on</strong>of the relati<strong>on</strong>ship between socioec<strong>on</strong>omictrends and the health of coastal and ocean resourceshas c<strong>on</strong>centrated <strong>on</strong> populati<strong>on</strong> growth, the effects ofgrowth in ec<strong>on</strong>omic activity have been ignored. Butec<strong>on</strong>omic activity, the growth in employment andoutput in the near shore area may be even moreimportant than pure populati<strong>on</strong> growth. To understandwhy requires understanding of the compositi<strong>on</strong>of growth.From 1990–2000 the United States gained 22milli<strong>on</strong> jobs. 12 Despite overall ec<strong>on</strong>omic growth,manufacturing jobs declined by over 600,000, whiletrade (wholesale and retail) plus services grew bynearly 17 milli<strong>on</strong>, accounting for nearly 80% of thejob growth. The decline in manufacturing industriessuch as steel producti<strong>on</strong>, ship building, and chemicalsreduced (often at great expense to local communities)the source of many major envir<strong>on</strong>mentalimpacts in the coastal area. Their replacement byhundreds of thousands of smaller establishments inFigure C.4 Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Growth 1990–2000By Inland and Near Shore120%100%80%60%40%20%0%Establishments■ Manufacturing Inland■ Manufacturing Near ShoreSource: BLS, NOEPEmploymentWagesGross StateProduct■ Trade and Services Inland■ Trade and ServicesNear Shorethe services and trade industries has allowed employmentgrowth to c<strong>on</strong>tinue, and even accelerate. Butthe sum total of those additi<strong>on</strong>al establishments hasrequired more and more land for buildings, parking,roads, and other infrastructure, placing proporti<strong>on</strong>atelyan even heavier demand <strong>on</strong> coastal lands andresources than the “old” ec<strong>on</strong>omy.This shift in the nature of the ec<strong>on</strong>omy has alsogreatly affected how we earn our living from theocean. Table C.6 shows the data for the private sectorocean ec<strong>on</strong>omy of the United States for 1990–2000,while Figure C.5 highlights changes in the oceanec<strong>on</strong>omy over the same period. The government andscientific research sectors are not included in theocean ec<strong>on</strong>omy because of data limitati<strong>on</strong>s, so thediscussi<strong>on</strong> in this paper is limited to the privateocean ec<strong>on</strong>omy. 13Overall in 2000, the ocean ec<strong>on</strong>omy accounteddirectly for 1.6% of employment and 1.4% of thetotal U.S. private ec<strong>on</strong>omy. While these may seemlike small proporti<strong>on</strong>s, they should be c<strong>on</strong>sidered inc<strong>on</strong>text:• The ocean ec<strong>on</strong>omy would be the 27th largeststate ec<strong>on</strong>omy in the nati<strong>on</strong> in 2000.• In 2000, the ocean ec<strong>on</strong>omy was almost 2.5times larger than the agricultural ec<strong>on</strong>omy interms of output, and over 150% larger thanemployment in the farm sector. This employmentfigure for the ocean sector does not includeemployment in fisheries harvesting. 14• In employment, the ocean sector is larger thanevery manufacturing industry. 15C 10A N O CEAN B LUEPRINT FOR THE 21ST C ENTURY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!