2009 Scenario Reliability Assessment - NERC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Scenario Reliability Self-AssessmentsTable RFC-1: JCSP Additional Transmission Lines for the Reference and 20 percent WindEnergy Scenarios within the RFC FootprintRFC LineLength(Miles)20 percentWindEnergyScenarioNERC RE(s) From Bus Name To Bus NameDoubleCircuitVoltage(kV)ReferenceScenarioMRO\RFC SALEM 345 BYRON 345 345 74 xSERC\RFC NEWTON 345 MEROM 345 345 43.2 xSERC\RFC CLINTON 345 DEQUINE 345 345 92.9 xRFC KEMPTON 500SAYERVILLE500 x 500 176 x xRFC\NPCC SAYERVILLE 500 RAMAPO 500 x 500 46.2 xRFC\NPCC SAYERVILLE 500 RAMAPO 500 500 46.2 xNPCC\RFC WATERCURE 765ERIE SOUTH765 765 167 xRFC SPRAGUE CRK 765BRIDGE WATER765 765 46 x xRFC KENO 765SPRAGUE CRK765 765 81 x xRFC GREENTOWN 765 BLUE CRK 765 765 59 xRFCBRIDGE WATER765SOUTHCANTON 765 765 163 x xBRIDGE WATERRFC765 BLUE CRK 765 765 110 x xRFC COOK 765 KENO 765 765 101 x xSOUTHRFC PERRY 765CANTON 765 765 75 xRFC ERIE SOUTH 765 PERRY 765 765 58 xRFC ROCKPORT 765GREENTOWN765 765 187 xRFC NELSON 765 PLANO 765 765 59 xRFC\SERC NELSON 765 QUAD CITY 765 765 36.8 xSERC\RFC ANTIOCH 765JACKSONFERRY 765 765 51 x xSERC\RFCEW FRANKFORT765 ROCKPORT 765 765 98.5 xSERC\RFC CLOVER 765JOSHUA FALLS765 765 43 xSERC\RFC PARADISE 765 ROCKPORT 765 765 46 x xSERC\RFC CLOVER 765 AXTON 765 765 58.2 xSERC\RFC CUNNINGHAM 765JOSHUA FALLS765 765 47.4 xSERC\RFC\NPCC POSSUM POINTE GARDEN CITY345 400 HVdc 470 xMRO\RFC\NPCC ARROWHEAD 500 NORWALK 800 HVdc 1620 xMRO\RFC\NPCC BROOKINGS 345 PLEASANTVILLE 800 HVdc 1450 xMRO\SERC\RFC COOPER 765SOUTHCANTON800 HVdcRFC\NPCC SOUTH CANTON RAMAPO 800 HVdc 1300 xSERC\RFC KINCAID BREED 800 HVdcRFC\SERC BREED POSSUM POINT 800 HVdc 1050 xSERC\RFC\NPCC KINCAID NORWALK 800 HVdc 1300 xSERC\RFC\NPCC BRAIDWOOD 345 PLEASANTVILLE 800 HVdc 1100 x2009 Scenario Reliability Assessment Page 127
Scenario Reliability Self-AssessmentsFigure RFC-6: JCSP Additional Transmission Lines within the RFC Footprint for the 20percent Wind Energy ScenarioTable 2: JCSP Additional Transformers for the Reference and 20 percent WindEnergy Scenarios in the RFC FootprintNERC RE From Bus Name To Bus NameVoltage(kV)ReferenceScenario20 percent WindEnergy ScenarioRFC SAYERVILLE 500 SAYERVILLE 230 500/230 x xRFC KENO 765 KENO 345 765/345 x xRFCSPRAGUE CRK765SPRAGUE CRK345 765/345 x xRFCBRIDGE WATER765BRIDGE WATER345 765/345 x xRFC PERRY 765 PERRY 345 765/345 xRFC ERIE SOUTH 765 ERIE SOUTH 345 765/345 xRFC NELSON 765 NELSON 345 765/345 xPage 1282009 Scenario Reliability Assessment
Page 1 and 2:
2009 Scenario ReliabilityAssessment
Page 3 and 4:
Table of ContentsTable of ContentsN
Page 5 and 6:
Executive SummaryTransmission Criti
Page 8 and 9:
Background Information for this Rep
Page 10:
Scenario Reliability Assessment Sum
Page 13 and 14:
Scenario Reliability Assessment Sum
Page 16 and 17:
Scenario Reliability Self-Assessmen
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81: Scenario Reliability Self-Assessmen
Page 164 and 165: Regional Reliability Scenario Self-
Page 180 and 181:
About This Reporto Nuclear scenario
Page 182 and 183:
Joint Coordinated System PlanThemat
Page 184 and 185:
Joint Coordinated System Plan2009 S
Page 186 and 187:
Scenario LetterScenario LetterDecem
Page 188 and 189:
Scenario LetterIn an effort to add
Page 190 and 191:
Scenario Letterd) Provide a table,
Page 192 and 193:
Reliability Assessment Subcommittee
Page 194 and 195:
Reliability Assessment Subcommittee
Page 196:
the reliability of theto ensurebulk
show all

2009 Scenario Reliability Assessment - NERC

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?