2009 Scenario Reliability Assessment - NERC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Scenario Reliability Self-AssessmentsFigure MRO-A.2: JCSP Transmission Overlay for 20 percent Wind Scenario for MRO-US2009 Scenario Reliability Assessment Page 55
Scenario Reliability Self-AssessmentsTable MRO-A.1: JCSP-Added Transmission Lines for Reference Case and 20percent Wind Scenario Case for MRO-US20TO BUS FROM BUS kVLineMilesRef.CaseFuturepercentWindFutureLAKEFIELD 345 WINNEBAGO 345 345 50 X XWINNEBAGO 345 ADAMS 345 345 74.6 X XNLAX 345 COLUMBIA 345 345 94 X XLEHIGH 345 HAZELTON 345 345 113 XHAZELTON 345 SALEM 345 345 64 X XSALEM 345 W MIDDLETON 345 345 74 X XPRAIRIE 345 ANTELOPE 345 345 226 XHETTINGER 345 BELFIELD 345 345 61 XWISHEK 345 HETTINGER 345 345 146 XWAHPETON 345 WISHEK 345 345 143 XOAHE 345 HETTINGER 345 345 152 XOAHE 345 FT THOMPSON 345 345 54 XFT THOMPSON 345 BROOKINGS 345 345 144 XFT THOMPSON 345 SIOUX CITY 345 345 189 XSIOUX CITY 345 LEHIGH 345 345 111 XWINNEBAGO 345 LEHIGH 345 345 85 XFAIRPORT 345 THOMAS HILL 345 345 97.9 XOTTUMWA 345 THOMAS HILL 345 345 108 XTHOMAS HILL 345 PALMYRA 345 345 61 XPRAIRIE 500 DORSEY 500 500 139 X XMAPLE RIVER 500 PRAIRIE 500 500 80.3 XMAPLE RIVER 345 PRAIRIE 345 345 80.3 XBIG STONE 345 MAPLE RIVER 345 345 107 X XBROOKINGS 345 BIG STONE 345 345 63 X XBROOKINGS 345 SPLIT ROCK 345 345 54.5 X XHAZLETON 765 ADAMS 765 765 78 XANTVLY-BRDLD TAP ANTELOPE 345 345 115 XMAPLE RIVER 500 ARROWHEAD 500 500 225 XFORBES 500 ARROWHEAD 500 500 53 XWISHEK 345 ANTVLY-BRDLD TAP 345 40 XANTVLY-BRDLD TAP BROADLAND 345 345 150 XWISHEK 345 JAMESTOWN 345 345 67.4 XBROADLAND 345 BROOKINGS 345 345 91 XWINNEBAGO 345 WEBSTER 345 345 81 XSALEM 345 BYRON 345 345 74 XRAUN-LEHIGH TAP 345 LEHIGH 345 345 65.7 XRAUN-LEHIGH TAP 345 DENISON 345 345 27 XDENISON 345 SCRANTON 345 345 48 XSCRANTON 345 GUTHRIE CNTR 345 345 24 XGUTHRIE CNTR 345 ANITA 345 345 22.4 XCBLUF-MADISON TAP MADISON 345 345 60 XCBLUF-MADISON TAP ANITA 345 345 20 XLEHIGH 765 RAUN 765 765 114 XPage 562009 Scenario Reliability Assessment
Page 1 and 2:
2009 Scenario ReliabilityAssessment
Page 3 and 4:
Table of ContentsTable of ContentsN
Page 5 and 6:
Executive SummaryTransmission Criti
Page 8 and 9: Background Information for this Rep
Page 10: Scenario Reliability Assessment Sum
Page 13 and 14: Scenario Reliability Assessment Sum
Page 16 and 17: Scenario Reliability Self-Assessmen
Page 108 and 109:
Scenario Reliability Self-Assessmen
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Regional Reliability Scenario Self-
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
About This Reporto Nuclear scenario
Page 182 and 183:
Joint Coordinated System PlanThemat
Page 184 and 185:
Joint Coordinated System Plan2009 S
Page 186 and 187:
Scenario LetterScenario LetterDecem
Page 188 and 189:
Scenario LetterIn an effort to add
Page 190 and 191:
Scenario Letterd) Provide a table,
Page 192 and 193:
Reliability Assessment Subcommittee
Page 194 and 195:
Reliability Assessment Subcommittee
Page 196:
the reliability of theto ensurebulk
show all

2009 Scenario Reliability Assessment - NERC

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?