2009 Scenario Reliability Assessment - NERC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Scenario Reliability Self-Assessmentsvalues reported for power transfers between the Central, Delta, Gateway, Southeastern andVACAR subregions indicate incremental transfer capabilities (above base transfers modeled)ranging from 0 MW to 4,000+ MW. It should be realized that several limits are valid only withthe completion of planned facility upgrades. If the new facilities are not built, the actual transferlimits may be lower. AC power-flow verification revealed no voltage constraints for the testedsubregional transfers.2009 Scenario Reliability Assessment Page 139
Scenario Reliability Self-AssessmentsThe foregoing bubble diagrams provide an assessment of the subregional incremental transfercapabilities and the Reference Case and Scenario Case Actual transfer capability levels vary as afunction of transfer direction, other transfer activity, generation dispatches, and load levels.The assessment of the interconnected SERC transmission systems within SERC applying NERCReliability Standards TPL-001 and TPL-002, for anticipated 2019 summer peak conditions,included the simulation of single contingencies throughout the SERC Region and the evaluationof the impacts of these contingencies on both individual and neighboring systems. Thecoordinated contingency screening activity encompassed in this assessment has identified nosignificant impacts on neighboring systems for local transmission contingencies tested.Individual system plans are in various stages of implementation and only for the purposes of thisscenario analysis are expected to be completed by the 2019 summer period.Page 1402009 Scenario Reliability Assessment
Page 1 and 2:
2009 Scenario ReliabilityAssessment
Page 3 and 4:
Table of ContentsTable of ContentsN
Page 5 and 6:
Executive SummaryTransmission Criti
Page 8 and 9:
Background Information for this Rep
Page 10:
Scenario Reliability Assessment Sum
Page 13 and 14:
Scenario Reliability Assessment Sum
Page 16 and 17:
Scenario Reliability Self-Assessmen
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93: Scenario Reliability Self-Assessmen
Page 164 and 165: Regional Reliability Scenario Self-
Page 180 and 181: About This Reporto Nuclear scenario
Page 182 and 183: Joint Coordinated System PlanThemat
Page 184 and 185: Joint Coordinated System Plan2009 S
Page 186 and 187: Scenario LetterScenario LetterDecem
Page 188 and 189: Scenario LetterIn an effort to add
Page 190 and 191: Scenario Letterd) Provide a table,
Page 192 and 193:
Reliability Assessment Subcommittee
Page 194 and 195:
Reliability Assessment Subcommittee
Page 196:
the reliability of theto ensurebulk
show all

2009 Scenario Reliability Assessment - NERC

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?