2009 Scenario Reliability Assessment - NERC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Scenario Reliability Self-AssessmentsFrequency response is not a concern for a hydro generator. However, depending on thepenetration level, frequency response can be a concern for a wind plant. Manitoba Hydroperforms the worst case nearby generator trip disturbances at maximum wind output andmonitors the under-frequency performance. A limit on the amount of wind that can be connectedwould be put in place if the transient under-frequency approaches the first setpoint of the underfrequencyload-shed relays. Alternatively, the wind plant would be required to provide inertialresponse. The 300 MW wind addition that is described above is not expected to cause anyfrequency response issues.Any wind located within Manitoba would be integrated into the market alongside existingresources within Manitoba. No market changes are required or assumed. However, there may bea benefit in sharing area control error differences between Manitoba and adjacent subregions.SaskatchewanSaskPower currently has 172 MW of installed wind capacity and has plans to add 25 MW in2011 and an additional 200 MW by 2013.Region DescriptionThe Midwest Reliability Organization (MRO) has 48 members which include Cooperative,Canadian Utility, Federal Power Marketing Agency, Generator and/or Power Marketer, SmallInvestor Owned Utility, Large Investor Owned Utility, Municipal Utility, Regulatory Participantand Transmission System Operator. The MRO has 19 Balancing Authorities (prior to MidwestISO BA consolidation) and 116 registered entities. The MRO Region as a whole is a summerpeaking Region. The MRO Region covers all or portions of Iowa, Illinois, Minnesota, Nebraska,North and South Dakota, Michigan, Montana, Wisconsin, and the provinces of Manitoba andSaskatchewan. The total geographic area is approximately 1,000,000 square miles with anapproximate population of 20 million.2009 Scenario Reliability Assessment Page 53
Scenario Reliability Self-AssessmentsMRO-Appendix AFigure MRO-A.1: JCSP Transmission Overlay for Reference Scenario for MRO-USPage 542009 Scenario Reliability Assessment
Page 1 and 2:
2009 Scenario ReliabilityAssessment
Page 3 and 4:
Table of ContentsTable of ContentsN
Page 5 and 6: Executive SummaryTransmission Criti
Page 8 and 9: Background Information for this Rep
Page 10: Scenario Reliability Assessment Sum
Page 13 and 14: Scenario Reliability Assessment Sum
Page 16 and 17: Scenario Reliability Self-Assessmen
Page 106 and 107:
Scenario Reliability Self-Assessmen
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Regional Reliability Scenario Self-
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
About This Reporto Nuclear scenario
Page 182 and 183:
Joint Coordinated System PlanThemat
Page 184 and 185:
Joint Coordinated System Plan2009 S
Page 186 and 187:
Scenario LetterScenario LetterDecem
Page 188 and 189:
Scenario LetterIn an effort to add
Page 190 and 191:
Scenario Letterd) Provide a table,
Page 192 and 193:
Reliability Assessment Subcommittee
Page 194 and 195:
Reliability Assessment Subcommittee
Page 196:
the reliability of theto ensurebulk
show all

2009 Scenario Reliability Assessment - NERC

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?