2009 Scenario Reliability Assessment - NERC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Scenario Reliability Self-AssessmentsRAUN 765 C BLUFFS 765 765 82 XC BLUFFS 765 COOPER 765 765 60 XCOOPER 765 IATAN 765 765 72 XADAIR 345 OTTUMWA 345 345 65 XE MOLINE 345 KEWANEE 345 345 31 XSPLIT ROCK 345 RAUN 765 345 88.2 XLEHIGH 765 HAZLETON 765 765 111 XHAZLETON 765 E MOLINE 765 765 107 XADAMS E MOLINE 400 HVdc 183 XC BLUFFS THOMAS HILL 400 HVdc 203 XARROWHEAD ADAMS 400 HVdc 223 XWISHEK MAPLE RIVER 400 HVdc 137 XMAPLE RIVER BIG STONE 400 HVdc 113 XBIG STONE BROOKINGS 400 HVdc 63.1 XLEHIGH RAUN 400 HVdc 115 XRAUN C BLUFFS 400 HVdc 84.5 XC BLUFFS COOPER 400 HVdc 58 XARROWHEAD LUDLOW 800 HVdcARROWHEAD HADDM NK 800 HVdcADAMS EAST SHORE 800 HVdcADAMS NORWALK 800 HVdc 1620 XWISHEK PLEASANTVILLE 800 HVdcMAPLE RIVER HUDSON 800 HVdcBIG STONE W 49 ST 800 HVdcBROOKINGS GOWANUS 800 HVdc 1450 XLEHIGH SOUTH CANTON 800 HVdcRAUN SOUTH CANTON 800 HVdcC BLUFFS SOUTH CANTON 800 HVdcCOOPER SOUTH CANTON 800 HVdc 1300 X2009 Scenario Reliability Assessment Page 57
Scenario Reliability Self-AssessmentsTable MRO-A.2: JCSP-Added Transformers for Reference Caseand 20 percent Wind Scenario Case for MRO-USTO BUS FROM BUS kVRef. CaseFuture20 percentWind FuturePRAIRIE 345 PRAIRIE 230 345/230 XHETTINGER 345 HETTINGER 230 345/230 XWISHEK 345 WISHEK 230 345/230 X XWAHPETON 345 WAHPETON 230 345/230 XOAHE 345 OAHE 230 345/230 XWINNEBAGO 345 WINNEBAGO 161 345/161 X XPRAIRIE 500 PRAIRIE 230 500/230 XMAPLE RIVER 500 MAPLE RIVER 345 500/345 XBIGSTONE 345 BIGSTONE 230 345/230 X XHAZELTON 765 HAZELTON 345 765/345 XADAMS 765 ADAMS 345 765/345 XE MOLINE 765 E MOLINE 345 765/345 XPRAIRIE 500 PRAIRIE 230 500/230 XARROWHEAD 500 ARROWHEAD 345 500/345 XLEHIGH 765 LEHIGH 345 765/345 XRAUN 765 RAUN 345 765/345 XCBLUFFS 765 CBLUFFS 345 765/345 XCOOPER 765 COOPER 345 765/345 XPage 582009 Scenario Reliability Assessment
Page 1 and 2:
2009 Scenario ReliabilityAssessment
Page 3 and 4:
Table of ContentsTable of ContentsN
Page 5 and 6:
Executive SummaryTransmission Criti
Page 8 and 9:
Background Information for this Rep
Page 10: Scenario Reliability Assessment Sum
Page 13 and 14: Scenario Reliability Assessment Sum
Page 16 and 17: Scenario Reliability Self-Assessmen
Page 110 and 111:
Scenario Reliability Self-Assessmen
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Regional Reliability Scenario Self-
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
About This Reporto Nuclear scenario
Page 182 and 183:
Joint Coordinated System PlanThemat
Page 184 and 185:
Joint Coordinated System Plan2009 S
Page 186 and 187:
Scenario LetterScenario LetterDecem
Page 188 and 189:
Scenario LetterIn an effort to add
Page 190 and 191:
Scenario Letterd) Provide a table,
Page 192 and 193:
Reliability Assessment Subcommittee
Page 194 and 195:
Reliability Assessment Subcommittee
Page 196:
the reliability of theto ensurebulk
show all

2009 Scenario Reliability Assessment - NERC

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?