12.07.2015 Views

GP-B Post-Flight Analysis—Final Report - Gravity Probe B - Stanford ...

GP-B Post-Flight Analysis—Final Report - Gravity Probe B - Stanford ...

GP-B Post-Flight Analysis—Final Report - Gravity Probe B - Stanford ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

After some initial experimentation a decision was made to solve for 9 parameters during each fit. Initially thosewere the 6 state variables (position and velocity) plus a drag coefficient and two sinusoidal in-track accelerationsat orbital period to account for mis-modeled drag and eccentricity vector component rates. Because slowlyvarying constant and sinusoidal axial thrusting components persisted throughout the science mission, <strong>GP</strong>-Borbit determination continued to solve for those 9 parameters after IOC. The unconstrained drag coefficientabsorbed the dominant in-track effects of the slow semi-major axis variations due to the sinusoidal axialthrusting term, and the in-track sinusoidal parameters modeled the eccentricity vector rate errors due to theconstant axial thrusting term.Figure 4-8. Usable <strong>GP</strong>S Points per Day (2005)Daily residual plots (Figure 4-9) are generated to assess how well the ephemeris fits the data. Standarddeviations for cross-track residuals are typically less than 5 meters, in-track residuals less than 10 meters, andradial residuals around 15 meters. It can be seen from Figure 4-6 that, for this solution, RMS values areprimarily due to data noise – the ephemeris errors are far smaller. The corresponding overlap comparisonsbetween successive daily 30-hr solutions are a better indication of actual orbit errors. Those daily orbitcomparisons typically yield in-track and radial variations of just a few meters, and cross-track variations areoften less than a meter.There are exceptions to this general pattern of operations. On several days (for example, day 66 in Figure 4-5)there were gaps in the <strong>GP</strong>S data that prevented the use of a normal 30-hour fit span. When such gaps occurred,2 or 3 days of <strong>GP</strong>S data were used to create an ephemeris segment spanning the gap. Also, on some days whenthe sinusoidal axial thrusting interacted with the orbital motion so as to generate in-track perturbations with anearly daily period, the in-track effects could not be well approximated by fitting a drag coefficient alone. Forthose ephemeris segments, it is possible to reprocess the data with shorter fit spans and fit additional parametersas needed.<strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Probe</strong> B — <strong>Post</strong> <strong>Flight</strong> Analysis • Final <strong>Report</strong> March 2007 115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!