12.07.2015 Views

GP-B Post-Flight Analysis—Final Report - Gravity Probe B - Stanford ...

GP-B Post-Flight Analysis—Final Report - Gravity Probe B - Stanford ...

GP-B Post-Flight Analysis—Final Report - Gravity Probe B - Stanford ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

direction (transverse to the space vehicle roll axis). Suspension voltage was applied at 0.5 seconds and remainedon until 6.0 seconds, after which the rotor was left unsuspended and it began to “fall”. The kinks in thetrajectory after the 6 second mark are points where the rotor “bounced” on the housing wall. The rotor is drivenhere by centrifugal acceleration of the housing with respect to the rotor. (This test was done prior to the finalmass trim of the spacecraft roll axis.) This test and others verified the functioning of the analog backup controlsystem on orbit.Figure 9-11. Initial suspension of gyroscope in analog backup mode (blue=A axis, green = B, red = C)The performance of the digital LQG controller was demonstrated by a series of step responses starting at 8 μmfrom the center of the housing. As is seen in Figure 9-12 and in more detail in Figure 9-13, the step responseshow high frequency (high bandwidth) overshoot oscillations when away from center and well damped (lowbandwidth) overshoot for steps near the center of the housing. The bottom plot in Figure 9-12 shows thebandwidth that the controller automatically selected during this run, ranging from 50 rad/sec (8 Hz) when therotor was far from center, down to 10 rad/sec (1.6 Hz) at the end of the snapshot. The controller bandwidthbottoms out at 3 rad/sec (0.5 Hz) during normal science operation.266 March 2007 Chapter 9 — Gyro Suspension Subsystem (GSS) Analysis

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!