12.07.2015 Views

GP-B Post-Flight Analysis—Final Report - Gravity Probe B - Stanford ...

GP-B Post-Flight Analysis—Final Report - Gravity Probe B - Stanford ...

GP-B Post-Flight Analysis—Final Report - Gravity Probe B - Stanford ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

expression, which otherwise on a point-by-point basis would add about 2% to the pointing noise. The commonmodenoise is removed to first order in the numerator of the normalized pointing signal since it is a differencebetween the + and – detector currents, which each contain the common-mode noise.We find the resulting RMS noise in units of marcsec using the fact that the noise is Gaussian and the fact thatthe actual pointing can not change a significant amount compared to the noise from sample to sample (only 0.1s). This allows the noise to be estimated using the first differences between adjacent samples.Equation 11-3Figure 11-11 through Figure 11-14 are plots of the calculated noise for the four detector pairs as a function oftime. The time is in days, where day 1 begins on January 1, 2004 at 0 hours. Each noise point is the average noiseduring one guide star valid period.Figure 11-11. X-axis, A side RMS pointing noise equivalent due to detector noise322 March 2007 Chapter 11 — Telescope Readout Subsystem (TRE) Analysis

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!