12.07.2015 Views

GP-B Post-Flight Analysis—Final Report - Gravity Probe B - Stanford ...

GP-B Post-Flight Analysis—Final Report - Gravity Probe B - Stanford ...

GP-B Post-Flight Analysis—Final Report - Gravity Probe B - Stanford ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure D-2 below shows the distribution of these categories across the major space vehicle subsystems. Becausethe vehicle is a system, not a collection of independent components, an observation may span more than onesubsystem.TuneItemsAnalysisitemsATCGSSTRESRECDHCOMDewarFigure D-2. Observation categories by subsystemThe key observation that can be made is that the two systems that could not be completely tested on the ground– the GSS and ATC systems – gathered a disproportionately large number of observation items. The othersystems had the advantage of being nearly fully testable in the lab and thus the operational bugs could beworked out prior to launch. Since the ATC and GSS require the space environment to function completely, theyrequired the most adjustment once on orbit.GMA29 14 7 2 6 1 1 602 4 1 7Features 6 28 2 10 19 2 3 6 1 2 2 5 86NonissuesOpsissues5 2 1 3 1 3 1 1 2 195 4 1 2 1 13Sum 47 52 10 15 21 4 13 1 6 1 1 2 3 9<strong>GP</strong>SEPSGyroPMTCSECUSum524 March 2007 Appendix D — Summary Table of <strong>Flight</strong> Anomalies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!