12.07.2015 Views

GP-B Post-Flight Analysis—Final Report - Gravity Probe B - Stanford ...

GP-B Post-Flight Analysis—Final Report - Gravity Probe B - Stanford ...

GP-B Post-Flight Analysis—Final Report - Gravity Probe B - Stanford ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.3.2.3 Staff: Anomaly Review BoardThe Anomaly Review Board, or simply the ARB, oversees the program-wide anomaly assessment and root causeinvestigation. This board is composed of senior <strong>Stanford</strong> University, Lockheed-Martin, and NASA technicalmanagers who have broad knowledge of the operation of the spacecraft, the payload, and the overall sciencemission.Each day, an anomaly board member is designated as the anomaly room chairperson. The anomaly reviewboard convenes during anomaly investigations; during non-anomaly periods the board members are generallyengaged with other program activities. This board:• Determines the membership of the anomaly teams.• Assesses the technical approach of the anomaly teams.• Oversees the progress of the investigations.• Prioritizes program resources for the various investigations.• Makes final recommendation to the program for anomaly resolution.Members of the board are available on an on-call basis and will be available on a 24 hour, 7 day/week schedule.5.3.2.4 Staff: Engineering Analysis TeamsThe Engineering Analysis Teams are the program technical experts who monitor and assess the health andperformance of the spacecraft and payload, but are not part of the real-time operations. These groups includeteams from <strong>Stanford</strong>, Lockheed-Martin, and NASA MSFC.All of these teams monitor the operation of the spacecraft and payload in both real time and through off-linedata processing and analysis. In the event that an anomaly or issue is noted by any of these teams, the team leadcontacts the anomaly room or the Mission Director to report the issue.5.3.3 Anomaly AssessmentUpon receipt of a new anomaly report, the Anomaly Coordinator and the Anomaly Review Board evaluates theanomaly using a detailed checklist. In summary, the board will:1. Assess vehicle safety issues.2. Assess dewar lifetime implications.3. Assess short and long term mission implications.4. Estimate response time requirement.5. Schedule an initial screening with the subsystem REs and Anomaly Board members.6. Identify priority among other anomaly team activities7. Identify near and long-term timeline flow implications.8. Determine anomaly team membership9. Develop fault tree to find root cause.10. Formulate investigation schedule and identify key decision points.<strong>Gravity</strong> <strong>Probe</strong> B — <strong>Post</strong> <strong>Flight</strong> Analysis • Final <strong>Report</strong> March 2007 129

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!