natural-products-in-plant-pest-management
natural-products-in-plant-pest-management
natural-products-in-plant-pest-management
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
116 L.A. Shcherbakovapathogenic fungi <strong>in</strong> vitro, halt their growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>plant</strong>a and play a role <strong>in</strong>mycoparasitism (Elad et al., 1982; Benitez et al., 1998; Lorito, 1998; Chern<strong>in</strong>and Chet, 2002). Oligosaccharides or chitosan derived from fungal cell wallsexposed to microbial glucanases and ch<strong>in</strong>ases elicit a cascade of defenceresponses <strong>in</strong> <strong>plant</strong>s: generation of ROS, <strong>in</strong>duction of pathogenesis-relatedprote<strong>in</strong>s (PR prote<strong>in</strong>s) (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>plant</strong> chit<strong>in</strong>ases and glucanases),phytoalex<strong>in</strong>s and lignification (Dyakov and Ozeratskovskaya, 2007).The potential of lytic enzymes for <strong>plant</strong>-disease <strong>management</strong> was welldemonstrated by study<strong>in</strong>g ch<strong>in</strong>olytic systems <strong>in</strong> the biocontrol bacteria Bacilluscereus, Pantoea agglomerans, Pantoea dispersa, and fungi, especially <strong>in</strong> thewidely used biocontrol fungus Trichoderma. Chit<strong>in</strong>ases produced by Trichodermaare effective on virtually all chit<strong>in</strong>ous pathogens, non-toxic for <strong>plant</strong>sand possess higher antifungal activity than such enzymes isolated from othersources. The antifungal activity of chit<strong>in</strong>ases from Trichoderma can reach thelevel of some chemical <strong>pest</strong>icides (Lorito, 1998; Bonaterra et al., 2003; Changet al., 2003; Gohel et al., 2004).Along with use of enzyme-produc<strong>in</strong>g biocontrol agents, there are severalother application strategies for ch<strong>in</strong>olytic enzymes. The most conventionalapproach consists of conferr<strong>in</strong>g resistance via eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g transgenic <strong>plant</strong>sconta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g heterologous chit<strong>in</strong>ase and glucanase genes. Overexpression ofthese genes <strong>in</strong> response to pathogen <strong>in</strong>vasion can cause higher levels of theenzymes <strong>in</strong> the <strong>plant</strong> cells followed by a faster and effective neutralization ofthe pathogen. Indeed, transgenic broccoli, potato and tobacco <strong>plant</strong>s express<strong>in</strong>gthe T. harzianum endochit<strong>in</strong>ase gene have been found to show resistanceaga<strong>in</strong>st A. alternata, A. solani, B. c<strong>in</strong>erea and R. solani. Transgenic tobacco andcabbage, carry<strong>in</strong>g a bean chit<strong>in</strong>ase gene were protected aga<strong>in</strong>st R. solani.Transgenic cucumber, rice, grapev<strong>in</strong>e, strawberry and wheat transformedwith chit<strong>in</strong>ase genes from rice (Oryza sativa) were resistant to B. c<strong>in</strong>erea,R. solani, M. grisea, Sphaerotheca humuli and F. gram<strong>in</strong>earum, respectively(Gohel et al., 2006). Expression of exochit<strong>in</strong>ase genes <strong>in</strong> transgenic apple treesconfers resistance to apple scab (Venturia <strong>in</strong>aequalis), a pathogen which is controlledby multiple applications of chemical fungicides dur<strong>in</strong>g the grow<strong>in</strong>gseason (Bolar et al., 2000). These results show the broad potential for themicrobial chit<strong>in</strong>ase transgenesis <strong>in</strong>to <strong>plant</strong>s for controll<strong>in</strong>g fungal phytopathogens.The additional strategies are related to fermentation and differentways of improv<strong>in</strong>g the enzyme producers (Gohel et al., 2006).Other cases suggest<strong>in</strong>g feasibility of crop protection with enzymes canbe illustrated by the examples of construct<strong>in</strong>g transgenic potato carry<strong>in</strong>gglucose oxidase gene from A. niger or apple, potato and tobacco <strong>plant</strong>sexpress<strong>in</strong>g the bacteriophage T4 lysozyme gene (Wu et al., 1997). Glucoseoxidase is an enzyme <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> generat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>plant</strong> ROS. Expression of theglucose oxidase gene led to accumulation of peroxide ions <strong>in</strong> <strong>plant</strong> tissuesthat <strong>in</strong>creased resistance to fungal diseases, e.g. to late blight (P. <strong>in</strong>festans),wilt (Verticillium dahliae) and early blight (A. solani). Lysozymes are widespreadenzymes that hydrolyse peptidoglycan of bacterial cell walls. Apple<strong>plant</strong>s with the T4L gene showed significant resistance to the fire blight agentE. amylovora (Ko et al., 2000), while potato and tobacco was resistant to