12.07.2015 Views

natural-products-in-plant-pest-management

natural-products-in-plant-pest-management

natural-products-in-plant-pest-management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

116 L.A. Shcherbakovapathogenic fungi <strong>in</strong> vitro, halt their growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>plant</strong>a and play a role <strong>in</strong>mycoparasitism (Elad et al., 1982; Benitez et al., 1998; Lorito, 1998; Chern<strong>in</strong>and Chet, 2002). Oligosaccharides or chitosan derived from fungal cell wallsexposed to microbial glucanases and ch<strong>in</strong>ases elicit a cascade of defenceresponses <strong>in</strong> <strong>plant</strong>s: generation of ROS, <strong>in</strong>duction of pathogenesis-relatedprote<strong>in</strong>s (PR prote<strong>in</strong>s) (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>plant</strong> chit<strong>in</strong>ases and glucanases),phytoalex<strong>in</strong>s and lignification (Dyakov and Ozeratskovskaya, 2007).The potential of lytic enzymes for <strong>plant</strong>-disease <strong>management</strong> was welldemonstrated by study<strong>in</strong>g ch<strong>in</strong>olytic systems <strong>in</strong> the biocontrol bacteria Bacilluscereus, Pantoea agglomerans, Pantoea dispersa, and fungi, especially <strong>in</strong> thewidely used biocontrol fungus Trichoderma. Chit<strong>in</strong>ases produced by Trichodermaare effective on virtually all chit<strong>in</strong>ous pathogens, non-toxic for <strong>plant</strong>sand possess higher antifungal activity than such enzymes isolated from othersources. The antifungal activity of chit<strong>in</strong>ases from Trichoderma can reach thelevel of some chemical <strong>pest</strong>icides (Lorito, 1998; Bonaterra et al., 2003; Changet al., 2003; Gohel et al., 2004).Along with use of enzyme-produc<strong>in</strong>g biocontrol agents, there are severalother application strategies for ch<strong>in</strong>olytic enzymes. The most conventionalapproach consists of conferr<strong>in</strong>g resistance via eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g transgenic <strong>plant</strong>sconta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g heterologous chit<strong>in</strong>ase and glucanase genes. Overexpression ofthese genes <strong>in</strong> response to pathogen <strong>in</strong>vasion can cause higher levels of theenzymes <strong>in</strong> the <strong>plant</strong> cells followed by a faster and effective neutralization ofthe pathogen. Indeed, transgenic broccoli, potato and tobacco <strong>plant</strong>s express<strong>in</strong>gthe T. harzianum endochit<strong>in</strong>ase gene have been found to show resistanceaga<strong>in</strong>st A. alternata, A. solani, B. c<strong>in</strong>erea and R. solani. Transgenic tobacco andcabbage, carry<strong>in</strong>g a bean chit<strong>in</strong>ase gene were protected aga<strong>in</strong>st R. solani.Transgenic cucumber, rice, grapev<strong>in</strong>e, strawberry and wheat transformedwith chit<strong>in</strong>ase genes from rice (Oryza sativa) were resistant to B. c<strong>in</strong>erea,R. solani, M. grisea, Sphaerotheca humuli and F. gram<strong>in</strong>earum, respectively(Gohel et al., 2006). Expression of exochit<strong>in</strong>ase genes <strong>in</strong> transgenic apple treesconfers resistance to apple scab (Venturia <strong>in</strong>aequalis), a pathogen which is controlledby multiple applications of chemical fungicides dur<strong>in</strong>g the grow<strong>in</strong>gseason (Bolar et al., 2000). These results show the broad potential for themicrobial chit<strong>in</strong>ase transgenesis <strong>in</strong>to <strong>plant</strong>s for controll<strong>in</strong>g fungal phytopathogens.The additional strategies are related to fermentation and differentways of improv<strong>in</strong>g the enzyme producers (Gohel et al., 2006).Other cases suggest<strong>in</strong>g feasibility of crop protection with enzymes canbe illustrated by the examples of construct<strong>in</strong>g transgenic potato carry<strong>in</strong>gglucose oxidase gene from A. niger or apple, potato and tobacco <strong>plant</strong>sexpress<strong>in</strong>g the bacteriophage T4 lysozyme gene (Wu et al., 1997). Glucoseoxidase is an enzyme <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> generat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>plant</strong> ROS. Expression of theglucose oxidase gene led to accumulation of peroxide ions <strong>in</strong> <strong>plant</strong> tissuesthat <strong>in</strong>creased resistance to fungal diseases, e.g. to late blight (P. <strong>in</strong>festans),wilt (Verticillium dahliae) and early blight (A. solani). Lysozymes are widespreadenzymes that hydrolyse peptidoglycan of bacterial cell walls. Apple<strong>plant</strong>s with the T4L gene showed significant resistance to the fire blight agentE. amylovora (Ko et al., 2000), while potato and tobacco was resistant to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!