12.07.2015 Views

natural-products-in-plant-pest-management

natural-products-in-plant-pest-management

natural-products-in-plant-pest-management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

80 J.C. Pretorius and E. van der Wattconsensus amongst scientists that research <strong>in</strong> this regard should concentrateon both the <strong>in</strong>hibitory and stimulatory effect of <strong>plant</strong> extracts on seed germ<strong>in</strong>ation,seedl<strong>in</strong>g growth and the physiology of other test <strong>plant</strong>s <strong>in</strong> order toverify the action at hand (Khan et al., 2001; Ameena and George, 2002; Cruzet al., 2002b; Duary, 2002; Obaid and Qasem, 2002).Probably the most effective compounds to enhance crop yield, crop efficiencyand seed vigour have been identified as brass<strong>in</strong>osteroids (BRs;Mandava, 1979; 1988), first extracted from rape (Brassica napus L.) pollen(Adam and Marquard, 1986). In a recent m<strong>in</strong>i-report, Zullo and Adam (2002)confirmed the prospective agricultural uses of BRs. The assumption of theirapplication potential was made from data collected over the past threedecades and only a few examples are presented here. Yield <strong>in</strong>creases thatwere <strong>in</strong> most <strong>in</strong>stances significant were reported, as cited by Zullo and Adam(2002), <strong>in</strong> beans and lettuce (Meudt et al., 1983), rice (Lim, 1987), maize (Limand Han, 1988), wheat (Takematsu et al., 1988), chickpea (Ramos, 1995) andtomato (Mori et al., 1986). Many other examples of BR use for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g cropyield can be found <strong>in</strong> the literature (Kamuro and Takatsuto, 1999; Khripachet al., 1999; Khripach et al., 2000).Besides their yield-improv<strong>in</strong>g effects, BRs have been shown to <strong>in</strong>crease<strong>plant</strong> growth <strong>in</strong> crops (Rao et al., 2002) and especially root growth (Müssiget al., 2003), to <strong>in</strong>crease resistance <strong>in</strong> crops towards low-temperature <strong>in</strong>jury(Kamuro and Takatsuto, 1999) and to <strong>in</strong>crease resistance of potato to <strong>in</strong>fectionsby Phytophthora <strong>in</strong>festans and Fusarium sulfureum (Kazakova et al., 1991).Although many BRs, such as 24-epibrass<strong>in</strong>olide, are commercially availableand employed <strong>in</strong> some countries, more accurate studies on dosage, methodand time of application, its suitability for the <strong>plant</strong> or cultivar, and associationwith other phytohormones are needed, because many of the results wereobta<strong>in</strong>ed by experiments performed <strong>in</strong> greenhouses or small fields (Zulloand Adam, 2002).A report on a prototype bio-stimulatory <strong>natural</strong> product developed froma BR-conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g extract of Lychnis viscaria came from Roth et al. (2000). In2003, after 12 years of <strong>in</strong>tensive research under laboratory, greenhouse andfield conditions at the University of the Free State, South Africa, a productwas listed <strong>in</strong> Germany as a <strong>plant</strong>-strengthen<strong>in</strong>g agent under the trade nameComCat and commercialized by a German company, Agraforum AG.Foliar applications of ComCat have been demonstrated to enhance consistentlyroot development <strong>in</strong> seedl<strong>in</strong>gs and f<strong>in</strong>al yields <strong>in</strong> a number of vegetable,fruit and row crops, as well as to <strong>in</strong>duce resistance <strong>in</strong> crops towardsabiotic and biotic stress conditions, and the mechanisms of action were elucidatedon both a metabolic and genetic level (unpublished results, Pretorius,J.C. and van der Watt, E., University of the Free State, South Africa). Recently,significant yield <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> tomato, preharvest treated with ComCat,were reported by Workneh et al. (2009). The authors also claimed more than70% shelf life extension and higher marketability <strong>in</strong> tomato fruit harvestedfrom <strong>plant</strong>s treated with ComCat dur<strong>in</strong>g the vegetative growth phase comparedto the untreated control under ambient storage conditions. PreharvestComCat treated tomatoes conta<strong>in</strong>ed lower total soluble sugar levels at

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!