12.07.2015 Views

natural-products-in-plant-pest-management

natural-products-in-plant-pest-management

natural-products-in-plant-pest-management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Suppressive Effects of Compost Tea on Phytopathogens 249Mycoparasitism is parasitism of a pathogenic fungus by another fungus.These events require specific <strong>in</strong>teractions between the parasite and fungalhost. The process <strong>in</strong>volves direct contact between the fungi, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> deathof the <strong>plant</strong> pathogen and nutrient absorption by the parasite. Trichodermaspp. parasitize fungal <strong>plant</strong> pathogens. The parasite extends hyphal branchestoward the target host, coils around and attaches to it with appressorium-likebodies, and punctures its mycelium (Chet et al., 1981; Goldman et al., 1994).Mycoparasites produce cell-wall-degrad<strong>in</strong>g enzymes, which allow them tobore holes <strong>in</strong>to other fungi and extract nutrients for their own growth. Butmany so-called mycoparasites also produce antibiotics, which may firstweaken the fungi they parasitize. So the digestion of host cell walls is accomplishedby a battery of excreted enzymes, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g proteases, chit<strong>in</strong>ases andglucanases. These enzymes often have antifungal activity <strong>in</strong>dividually andare synergistic <strong>in</strong> mixtures or with antibiotics (Di Pietro et al., 1993; Loritoet al., 1993, 1994; Handelsman and Stabb, 1996). By manipulat<strong>in</strong>g their activitythrough the construction of ‘overproduc<strong>in</strong>g’ mutants, enzyme-negativemutants or even transgenic <strong>plant</strong>s express<strong>in</strong>g the enzyme, a role for theirproduction <strong>in</strong> biocontrol has been implied (Whipps, 2001).The best documented examples of hyperparasitism <strong>in</strong>volve the mycoparasiticTrichoderma spp. on R. solani. Highly competitive as a saprophyte,R. solani, can utilize cellulose and colonize fresh bark but cannot colonize thelow-<strong>in</strong>-cellulose mature bark compost. However, isolates of Trichoderma thatfunction as biological agents for R. solani are capable of coloniz<strong>in</strong>g maturecompost. Biological control does not occur <strong>in</strong> fresh, undecomposted organicmatter because both fungi grow as saprophytes and R. solani rema<strong>in</strong>s capableof caus<strong>in</strong>g disease. In mature compost, on the other hand, sclerotia of R. solaniare killed by the hyperparasites and biological control prevails (Hoit<strong>in</strong>k andFahy, 1986; Chung and Hoit<strong>in</strong>k, 1990). One way to ensure specific suppressionis to <strong>in</strong>oculate the compost with the appropriate beneficial microorganisms,fungus like Trichoderma sp., Talaromyces flavus, non-pathogenic Fusariumoxysporum, or bacterial like Bacillus subtilis and Streptomyces griseoviride,which leads to <strong>in</strong>creased levels of disease suppressiveness.Induced resistanceThe <strong>natural</strong> resistance of <strong>plant</strong>s to pathogens is based on the comb<strong>in</strong>ed effectsof preformed barriers and <strong>in</strong>duced mechanisms. In both cases, <strong>plant</strong>s usephysical and antimicrobial defences aga<strong>in</strong>st the <strong>in</strong>vaders. In contrast to constitutiveresistance, <strong>in</strong>duced resistance relies on recognition of an <strong>in</strong>vaderand subsequent signal transduction events lead<strong>in</strong>g to the activation ofdefences (Mauch-Mani and Métraux, 1998). Plants possess active defencemechanisms aga<strong>in</strong>st pathogen attack; some biotic and abiotic stimuli <strong>in</strong>creasetheir tolerance to <strong>in</strong>fection by a pathogen, by activation of these active defencemechanisms. This phenomenon is known as <strong>in</strong>duced resistance. Inducedresistance was def<strong>in</strong>ed by Kloepper et al. (1992) as ‘the process of active resistancedependent on the host <strong>plant</strong>’s physical or chemical barriers, activated

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!