12.07.2015 Views

natural-products-in-plant-pest-management

natural-products-in-plant-pest-management

natural-products-in-plant-pest-management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Control of Virus Diseases of Plants 155et al., 1992; Barbieri et al., 1993). Type-I RIPs consist of a s<strong>in</strong>gle polypeptidecha<strong>in</strong> that is enzymatically active. These are scarcely toxic to animals and<strong>in</strong>hibit prote<strong>in</strong> synthesis <strong>in</strong> cell-free systems, but have little or no effect onwhole cells. The three well known antiviral prote<strong>in</strong>s PAPs, dianth<strong>in</strong>s andMAP belong to this category. Type-II RIPs conta<strong>in</strong> two types of polypeptidecha<strong>in</strong>s. Cha<strong>in</strong> A is l<strong>in</strong>ked to cha<strong>in</strong> B through a disulfide bond. Cha<strong>in</strong> B b<strong>in</strong>dsthe tox<strong>in</strong> to the cell surface and cha<strong>in</strong> A enzymatically <strong>in</strong>activates the ribosomes(Olsnes and Pihl, 1982). These are toxic to cells and <strong>in</strong>hibit prote<strong>in</strong>synthesis <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tact cells and <strong>in</strong> cell-free systems. Several similarities existamong the type-I RIPs. They are all basic prote<strong>in</strong>s with a molecular weight <strong>in</strong>the range 26–32 kDa. They have an alkal<strong>in</strong>e isoelectric po<strong>in</strong>t and are usuallystable, be<strong>in</strong>g resistant to denatur<strong>in</strong>g agents and protease. A majority of theRIPs are glycoprote<strong>in</strong>s. Type-I RIPs are strongly immunogenic. Strocchi et al.(1992) established that cross reactivity between RIPs obta<strong>in</strong>ed from unrelated<strong>plant</strong>s was either very weak or absent.Recently clon<strong>in</strong>g and expression of antiviral/ribosome-<strong>in</strong>activat<strong>in</strong>gprote<strong>in</strong> from Bouga<strong>in</strong>villea xbuttiana was reported by Choudhary et al. (2008).They reported that full-length cDNA encod<strong>in</strong>g ribosome <strong>in</strong>activat<strong>in</strong>g/ antiviral prote<strong>in</strong> (RIP /AVP) consisted of 1364 nucleotides with an openread<strong>in</strong>g frame (ORF) of 960 nucleotides encod<strong>in</strong>g a 35.49 kDa prote<strong>in</strong> of 319am<strong>in</strong>o acids.The three well known antiviral prote<strong>in</strong>s, namely PAPs (from Phytolaccaamericana), dianth<strong>in</strong>s (from Dianthus caryophyllus) and MAPs (from Mirabilisjalapa) belong to the category of type-I RIPs.Pokeweed antiviral prote<strong>in</strong>s (PAPs)The antiviral prote<strong>in</strong> present <strong>in</strong> the leaves of Phytolacca americana was purifiedto homogeneity and its molecular weight determ<strong>in</strong>ed as 29 kDa (Irv<strong>in</strong>, 1975).This prote<strong>in</strong>, called pokeweed antiviral prote<strong>in</strong> (PAP), had a PI of 8.1 (Irv<strong>in</strong>,1983). The antiviral effect of PAP was most pronounced when it was co<strong>in</strong>oculatedwith the virus. PAP also <strong>in</strong>hibited virus <strong>in</strong>fection when appliedprior to virus challenge. Local lesion formation by TMV on N. tabacum cv.Xanthi-nc was <strong>in</strong>hibited by nearly 70% even after 48 h of treatment. The virus<strong>in</strong>hibitory effect of PAP <strong>in</strong>creased with the decrease <strong>in</strong> the time lapse betweentreatment and challenge <strong>in</strong>oculation. PAP was less effective <strong>in</strong> prevent<strong>in</strong>gvirus <strong>in</strong>fection when applied a short time after virus <strong>in</strong>oculation. No <strong>in</strong>hibitionwas observed when PAP was applied 50 m<strong>in</strong> after virus <strong>in</strong>fection (Chenet al., 1991). PAP reduced <strong>in</strong>fectivity of several mechanically transmitted RNAand DNA viruses when the purified virus or sap from virus-<strong>in</strong>fected <strong>plant</strong>swas mixed with an equal volume of PAP solution and the mixture rubbed onthe leaves of the local-lesion hosts (N. glut<strong>in</strong>osa / TMV; Chenopodium qu<strong>in</strong>oa /CMV; C. amaranticolor / TMV, CMV, alfalfa mosaic virus, PVY; Gomphrena globosa/ PVX) or systemic hosts (Brassica cam<strong>pest</strong>ris / cauliflower mosaic virus;N. benthamiana / African cassava mosaic virus). PAP, thus, appears to be ageneral <strong>in</strong>hibitor of virus <strong>in</strong>fection (Toml<strong>in</strong>son et al., 1974; Stevens et al., 1981;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!