12.07.2015 Views

natural-products-in-plant-pest-management

natural-products-in-plant-pest-management

natural-products-in-plant-pest-management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Phytochemicals as Natural Fumigants 181Table 8.6. Fumigant activity of the essential oil SEM76 extracted from Labiatae species onvarious developmental stages of Callosobruchus maculatus.Stage treatedAgeConcentration(µl/l)No. ofeggsNo. ofadultsF 1Eggs developed toadults (%)Egg 20–24 h 0.5 20 0 0Larvae outside 0–1 day 0.5 20 0 0the seedLarvae <strong>in</strong>side 2 days 1.0 20 3.5 17the seed1.5 20 4.5 22Larvae 3 days 1.5 20 10.5 533.0 20 8 40Larvae 7 days 1.5 20 14 703.0 20 13 63Larvae 11 days 1.5 20 17.5 883.0 20 16.5 83Pupae4–5 daysbefore1.53.0202012116055emergencePupae1–2 days0.5 20 4 20before1.5 20 1 5emergence 3.0 20 0 0Control 0 20 17 85Twenty unsexed adults were used for each test. The data are an average of three duplicateexperiments. Exposure time was 24 h.8.5 Distribution of a-Terp<strong>in</strong>eol <strong>in</strong> the Fumigation ChamberMost of the research to study the potential of essential oils and their constituents(terpenes) for the control of <strong>in</strong>sect <strong>pest</strong>s was done us<strong>in</strong>g space fumigation,without pay<strong>in</strong>g attention to the amount of the fumigant available to thetreated <strong>in</strong>sects. As a model, we studied the distribution of the terpenoidα-terp<strong>in</strong>eol <strong>in</strong> the fumigation chamber among the air <strong>in</strong> the chamber space,filter paper and the flask walls. Us<strong>in</strong>g concentrations of 3, 5, 10 and 15 mg/lair and stirr<strong>in</strong>g at 20°C, only m<strong>in</strong>or differences <strong>in</strong> the amount of the terpenoid<strong>in</strong> the chamber space was measured: 0.710, 0.676, 0.782 and 0.897 mg/lair, respectively. The rest was found on the filter paper and the flask walls(Table 8.7). At a higher temperature of 25°C, a higher amount of the terpenoid,50–60%, was recovered <strong>in</strong> the chamber space compared to the amountrecovered at 20°C (Table 8.7). No pronounced change of the terpenoid <strong>in</strong> thechamber space was measured at a different <strong>in</strong>tensity of stirr<strong>in</strong>g or when nostirr<strong>in</strong>g was applied (Table 8.8). It should be mentioned that stirr<strong>in</strong>g causeda higher concentration of the terpenoid on the glass walls compared to thefilter paper, and the opposite if no stirr<strong>in</strong>g was applied (Table 8.8). Us<strong>in</strong>gstirr<strong>in</strong>g at 20°C, we could show that after 2 h of fumigation the air <strong>in</strong> thefumigation chamber was already saturated (Table 8.9).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!